000 01591 2200253 4500
001 408858
011 _a00111287
090 _a408858
100 _a20240917d kkky0pory50 ba
101 _aeng
102 _aUS
200 _aAssessing aftercare reforms in Pennsylvania’s Juvenile Justice System
_fMonica Mielke
330 _aAftercare seeks to address challenges juveniles face when re-entering the community after residential placement. This study compares changes in recidivism in five Pennsylvania counties that piloted aftercare reforms in 2005 to 2010 as part of Models for Change to recidivism in counties that did not. The sample includes 3,107 referrals to court in pilot counties and 8,272 in comparison counties. Estimates show no discernible effect of the reforms on recidivism. The estimated change in re-referrals to court lies between a decrease of 4 percentage points and an increase of 14 points. Differences in implementation effectiveness and participation may explain these null results. Although this analysis does not detect changes in recidivism, these pilots laid the groundwork for Pennsylvania’s later juvenile justice reforms.
461 _cWashington
_d2023
_pp. 1-23
_tCrime & Delinquency
_v[s.n.]
606 _9102475
_aJUSTIÇA JUVENIL
606 _9106128
_aREINCIDÊNCIA CRIMINAL
606 _96471
_aREABILITAÇÃO
606 _9689
_aDELINQUÊNCIA JUVENIL
675 _9402782
_a343.121.5
700 _9423123
_aMielke
_bMonica
_cUniversity of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
801 _aPT
_gRPC
852 _j343.121.5MIE