| 000 | 01410 2200241 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 408854 | ||
| 011 | _a20662203 | ||
| 090 | _a408854 | ||
| 100 | _a20240913d kkky0pory50 ba | ||
| 101 | _aeng | ||
| 102 | _aRO | ||
| 200 |
_aElectronic monitoring and supervision _ea comparative perspective _fKristel Beyens |
||
| 330 | _aThe use of electronic monitoring (EM) has grown rapidly in Europe and elsewhere and is likely to continue to do so. EM is a technological tool that allows to monitor the location of individuals via an electronic ankle tag, to track the movements of individuals either in real time or retrospectively. This special issue of the European Journal of Probation focuses on the relationship of EM with supervision in four jurisdictions (Belgium, Germany, The Netherlands and Scotland) and the question whether EM is mainly used as a stand-alone order or as an integrated measure; that is, alongside other supervisory conditions. It also contains a contribution with an initial round up of Australian experiences with EM. | ||
| 461 |
_cBucarest _d2017 _pp. 3-10 _tEuropean Journal of Probation _vVol. 9, nº 1 _x20662203 |
||
| 606 |
_92026 _aVIGILÂNCIA ELECTRÓNICA |
||
| 606 |
_9402740 _aMONITORIZAÇÃO ELETRÓNICA |
||
| 606 |
_9410863 _aEXECUÇÃO DA PENA |
||
| 675 |
_9420646 _a343.8 |
||
| 700 |
_9422243 _aBeyens _bKristel |
||
| 801 | _aPT | ||
| 852 | _j343.8BEY | ||