| 000 | 04087nam a2200277 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 394972 | ||
| 010 | _a9781464800870 | ||
| 090 | _a394972 | ||
| 100 | _a20180316d2014 y0pory50 ba | ||
| 101 | _aeng | ||
| 200 |
_aLeft out of the bargain _bRecurso eletrónico _esettlements in foreign bribery cases and implications for asset recovery _fJacinta Anyango Oduor ...[et al.] |
||
| 210 |
_aWashington, DC _cWorld Bank _d2014 |
||
| 215 |
_a1 CD-ROM _d12 cm |
||
| 225 | _aThe Stolen Asset Recovery (StAR) | ||
| 300 | _aFicheiro de 2,26 MB em formato PDF (181 p.). | ||
| 330 | _aContributors. Acknowledgments. Abbreviations. Executive Summary. 1. Key Findings. 2. Additional Observations. 3. StAR’s Proposals. Introduction. 1. Background. 2. United Nations Convention against Corruption: Setting the Stage. 3. Methodology and Overview of the Study. 1. Settlements in Foreign Bribery Cases. 1. Defining the Term Settlement. 2. Legal Frameworks for Settlements. 3. Shortened Criminal Procedures and Other Forms in Certain Civil Law Countries. 3.1 Switzerland. 3.2 Norway. 3.3 Italy. 3.4 Germany. 4. Guilty Pleas, Civil Liability, and Other Forms in Certain Common Law Countries. 4.1 United Kingdom. 4.2 Canada. 4.3 Nigeria. 4.4 United States. 2. Common Threads and General Observations about Settlements. 1. Criteria for Understanding Settlements. 1.1 Forms of Legal Liability: Criminal, Civil, and Administrative. 1.2 Judicial Oversight. 1.3 Transparency. 2. Terms Typically Included in Settlements. 3. The Role of International Organizations in Settlements. 4. The Rationale behind Settlements. 5. Trends and Developments. 5.1 General Trends. 5.2 Developments in Countries Whose Officials Have Been the Object of Alleged Bribes. 3. The Impact of Settlements on Pending and Future Cases in Other Jurisdictions. 1. The Principles of Ne Bis in Idem and Double Jeopardy. 2. International Cooperation and Mutual Legal Assistance. 4. Implications of Settlements on Asset Recovery. 1. Recovering Assets in the Context of Settlements: The Current State of Affairs. 1.1 Combination and Ratio of Monetary Sanctions: Sample Jurisdictional Comparisons. 1.2 Monetary Sanctions Imposed. 1.3 Involvement of Public Procurement Contracts and State-Owned Enterprises. 2. Barriers to Asset Recovery in the Context of Settlements. 3. Modes of Participation in Criminal Enforcement Actions for the Purpose of Asset Recovery. 3.1 Participation of Affected Countries through Formal Legal Avenues. 3.2 Participation in Criminal Enforcement Action in Civil Law Jurisdictions. 3.3 Restitution and Compensation in Common Law Jurisdictions. 3.4 Participation of Affected Countries in Settlements through Other Avenues. 4. Conclusion. 5. Conclusions. 6. Case Summaries. 1. Alcatel-Lucent (Costa Rica and United States). 2. Alstom (Switzerland, Tunisia, Latvia, Malaysia, and World Bank). 3. BAE Systems (Tanzania, United Kingdom, and United States). 4. Daimler (More than 22 Countries). 5. Haiti Teleco (Haiti and United States). 6. Innospec (United Kingdom and United States). 7. Johnson & Johnson (Greece, United Kingdom, and United States). 8. Mabey & Johnson (Ghana, Iraq, Jamaica, and United Kingdom). 9. Macmillan Publishers (United Kingdom and World Bank). 10. Mercator/Giffen et al. (Kazakhstan, Switzerland, and United States). 11. Schneider Electric (Lesotho). 12. Siemens AG (Germany, Greece, Italy, Nigeria, United States, and others). 13. Statoil (Norway and United States). 14. TSKJ Consortium (Nigeria, United Kingdom, and United States). Appendix I Forms of Legal Remedies Relevant to Foreign Bribery Cases. Appendix II U.K. Remedies. Appendix III Settlements Cases Database: Methodology. Appendix IV Glossary. Boxes. Figures. Map. Tables. | ||
| 606 |
_aSUBORNO _9301519 |
||
| 606 |
_aCORRUPÇÃO _9229145 |
||
| 606 |
_aPREVENÇÃO DA CORRUPÇÃO _9323405 |
||
| 606 |
_aLEGISLAÇÃO PENAL _9275821 |
||
| 606 |
_aRECUPERAÇÃO DE ACTIVOS _920358 |
||
| 606 |
_aESTUDO DE CASOS _9322367 |
||
| 710 |
_aLEFT OUT OF THE BARGAIN _9358693 |
||
| 955 | _xOferta | ||