| 000 | 02100nam a2200277 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 393783 | ||
| 010 | _a9789289911344 ; ISSN 17252806 | ||
| 090 | _a393783 | ||
| 100 | _a20160310d2014 y0pory50 ba | ||
| 101 | _aeng | ||
| 200 |
_aBanks, shadow banking, and fragility _bRecurso eletrónico _fStephan Luck, Paul Schempp |
||
| 210 |
_aFrankfurt am Main _cEuropean Central Bank _d2014 |
||
| 215 |
_a1 CD-ROM _d12 cm |
||
| 225 |
_aWorking Paper Series _v1726 |
||
| 300 | _aFicheiro de 0,99 MB em formato PDF (39 p.). Disponível também em: https://www.ecb.europa.eu/pub/pdf/scpwps/ecbwp1726.pdf?c3e13c57f91d8bf9d4065042337eb10c. Acedido a 10 de março de 2016. | ||
| 330 | _a"This paper studies a banking model of maturity transformation in which regulatory arbitrage induces the coexistence of regulated commercial banks and unregulated shadow banks. We derive three main results: First, the relative size of the shadow banking sector determines the stability of the financial system. If the shadow banking sector is small relative to the capacity of secondary markets for shadow banks' assets, shadow banking is stable. In turn, if the sector grows too large, it becomes fragile: an additional equilibrium emerges that is characterized by a panic-based run in the shadow banking sector. Second, if regulated commercial banks themselves operate shadow banks, a larger shadow banking sector is sustainable. However, once the threat of a crisis reappears, a crisis in the shadow banking sector spreads to the commercial banking sector. Third, in the presence of regulatory arbitrage, a safety net for banks may fail to prevent a banking crisis. Moreover, the safety net may be tested and may eventually become costly for the regulator." | ||
| 606 |
_aMERCADO FINANCEIRO _9227061 |
||
| 606 |
_aTRANSACÇÃO FINANCEIRA _9343169 |
||
| 606 |
_aINTERMEDIÁRIO FINANCEIRO _9316718 |
||
| 606 |
_aSISTEMA FINANCEIRO _9245947 |
||
| 700 |
_aLUCK _bStephan _9358046 |
||
| 701 |
_aSCHEMPP _bPaul _9358047 |
||
| 955 | _xOferta | ||