000			03571nam a2200265 4500
001			393767
090			_a393767
100			_a20160301d2015 y0pory50 ba
101			_aeng
200			_aIdentifying risky places for crime _bRecurso eletrónico _ean analysis of the criminogenic spatiotemporal influences of landscape features on street robberies _fYasemin Irvin-Erickson
210			_a[Rockville, MD] _cNational Criminal Justice Reference Service (NCJRS) _d2015
215			_a1 CD-ROM _d12 cm
300			_aDissertation submitted to the Graduate School-Newark Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey in partial fulfillment of requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Graduate Program in the School of Criminal Justice (under direction of Joel M. Caplan) [and to] the U.S. Department of Justice (Award nr. 2012-IJ-CX-0005). Ficheiro de 4,52 MB em formato PDF (161 p.).
330			_aAbstract. Acknowledgements. Table of contents. List of tables. List of figures. Introduction. Chapter 1: conceptual framework. 1.1. Why location matters. 1.2. Predecessors of contextual crime analysis. 1.3. Determinants of vulnerability to crime risk at micro places. Crime opportunities and risky places. Risky places and risky times. Risk terrain modeling. 1.4. Determinants of street robbery risk at micro places. Street robberies and cash economies. Street robberies and public transit stations. Street robberies and illegal markets. Street robberies, public housing, and schools. 1.5. Research questions and hypotheses. Chapter 2: study setting and data sources. 2.1. Study setting. 2.2. Data sources. Dependent variable. Independent variables. Chapter 3: the individual temporal criminogenic influences of landscape features on street robberies. 3.1. Testing hypothesis #1: do spatial extents of criminogenic influences change temporally? Choosing the spatial extents for operationalizing the spatial influences of landscape features on street robberies. Findings. Summary. 3.2. Testing hypothesis #2: Do criminogenic landscape features for street robberies vary temporally? Digitizing and testing the spatial influence of criminogenic features of the landscape with the selected spatial extents. Findings. Summary. 3.3. Testing hypothesis #3: Do weights of the criminogenic spatial influence of landscape features for street robberies vary temporally? Calculating the relative spatial influence and weight of each criminogenic risk factor. Findings. Summary. Chapter 4: the combined temporal criminogenic influences of landscape features on street robberies. 4.1. Testing Hypothesis #4 and #5: Do street robberies emerge at risky places of combined criminogenic influences at different times of the day and different days of the week? Producing composite risk terrain maps with the weighted risk map layers and testing the statistical significance of the models. Findings. Summary. Chapter 5: overview and discussion of findings. Chapter 6: conclusion. 6.1. Implications for environmental criminology. 6.2. Implications for risk assessment. 6.3. Implications for crime prevention. 6.4. Avenues for future research and concluding remarks. References.
606			_aMEIO AMBIENTE E O CRIME _9343298
606			_aURBANISMO E CRIMINALIDADE _9343731
606			_aGEOGRAFIA CRIMINAL _9329853
606			_aMAPEAMENTO DO CRIME _9343998
606			_aANÁLISE CRIMINAL _9321724
606			_aESTADOS UNIDOS _9334103
700			_aIRVIN-ERICKSON _bYasemin _9318620
955			_xOferta