000			02925nam a2200277 4500
001			393195
090			_a393195
100			_a20150416d2013 y0pory50 ba
101			_aeng
200			_aThe acquisition of sebaceous fingerprint topology using Columnar Thin Films (CTF) on forensically relevant substrates _bRecurso eletrónico _fRobert Shaler, Akhlesh Lakhtakia
210			_a[Rockville, MD] _cNational Criminal Justice Reference Service (NCJRS) _d2013
215			_a1 CD-ROM _d12 cm
300			_aFinal technical report submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice. NIJ Award Number: 2010-DN-BX-K232. Ficheiro de 2,41 MB em formato PDF (57 p.).
330			_aExecutive summary. Purpose. Research design. Findings and conclusions. Data analysis. Implications for policy and practice. Main body. I. Introduction. I.1. Statement of the problem. I.2. Literature review. I.2.1. Nonporous substrates: Metals, handles of weapons (plastics & wood), adhesive tapes. I.2.2. Porous substrates. I.2.3. Environmental stress and ageing. I.2.4. Partial bloody prints. I.2.5. CTF technology. I.2.6. Pitfalls. I.3. Statement of hypothesis or rationale for the research. II. Methods. II.1. General overview and research design. II.2. Initial comprehensive study. II.2.1. Forensically relevant substrates. II.2.2. Fingerprint collection procedure. II.2.3. Evaporant materials. II.2.4. Optimization of CTF development. II.2.5. Selected traditional development techniques. II.2.6. Imaging of fingerprints. II.2.7. Subjective grading of fingerprints. II.3. Depleted fingerprint series. II.4. Partial bloody fingerprints. II.5. Discharged cartridge casings. II.6. Fluorescent evaporant materials. II.7. Preliminary comparison of CTF technique with VMD. II.8. Objective fingerprint grading system. III. Results. III.1. Statement of results. III.1.1. Initial comprehensive study. III.1.1.1. Phase I: Optimization of CTF development. III.1.1.2. Phase II: Comparison with selected traditional development techniques. III.1.2. Depleted fingerprint series. III.1.3. Partial bloody fingerprints. III.1.4. Discharged cartridge casings. III.1.5. Fluorescent evaporant materials. III.1.6. Objective fingerprint grading system. III.1.7. Preliminary comparison of CTF technique with VMD. III.2. Tables. III.3. Figures. IV. Conclusions. IV.1. Discussion of findings. IV.2. Implication for policy and practice. IV.3. Implication for future research. V. References. VI. Dissemination of research findings.
606			_aLOFOSCOPIA _9320264
606			_aANÁLISE LABORATORIAL _9326721
606			_aANÁLISE DE VESTÍGIOS _9320649
606			_aCIÊNCIA FORENSE _9321508
606			_aTÉCNICA DE INVESTIGAÇÃO CRIMINAL _9343118
700			_aSHALER _bRobert _9357687
701			_aLAKHTAKIA _bAkhlesh _9357688
955			_xOferta