| 000 | 03623nam a2200277 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 391200 | ||
| 090 | _a391200 | ||
| 100 | _a20121012d2012 y0pory50 ba | ||
| 101 | _aeng | ||
| 200 |
_aA national overview of prostitution and sex trafficking demand reduction efforts _bRecurso eletrónico _efinal report _fMichael Shively ... [et al.] |
||
| 210 |
_aCambridge, MA _ced. do a. _d2012 |
||
| 215 |
_a1 CD-ROM _d12 cm |
||
| 300 | _aResearch report submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice (NIJ), Award n. 2008-IJ-CX-0010. Ficheiro de 6,50 MB em formato PDF (244 p.). Disponível também em: https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/238796.pdf. Acedido a 12 ed outubro de 2012. | ||
| 330 | _aExecutive summary. Project background and objectives. Purpose and structure of this report. Data collection. Key findings. Findings from literature review. Findings from national assessment data collection. History of demand reduction approaches pursued in the U.S. Key innovations. Costs of interventions. Need for improved access to information. Other key findings. Additional information available on demandforum.net. Acknowledgments. 1. Introduction. 2. Prostitution, Sex Trafficking, and Demand. Illegal commercial sex markets. Demand: men’s decisions to buy sex. Prostitution, sex trafficking, and harm. Stratification of the commercial sex industry. Human trafficking and prostitution. Vulnerable women and girls drawn into prostitution. Impact on “providers”. Impact on “consumers”. Impact on communities. Burden on law enforcement and other public services. Challenges in constraining supply & distribution. 3. Tactics used to combat demand in the United States. A typology of demand reduction programs and practices. The prevalence and first known use of demand reduction tactics in the United States. Public education & awareness programs. Reverse stings. Street-level reverse stings. Web-based reverse stings. Shaming. “Dear John” letters. Vehicle seizure. Driver’s license suspension. Geographic restraining (“SOAP”) orders. Neighborhood action. Surveillance cameras. Community service. John Schools. Generic John School logic model. Targeting the educational intervention. Prevalence of John School programs. Community impact panels. John School curriculum items. Common misconceptions about John Schools. Additional observations about John Schools. 4. Discussion. Description versus Evaluation. Demand-reduction is primary prevention. Combating demand: major needs and opportunities. Appendices. Appendix A: Bibliography. Appendix B: Research method. Appendix C: Data collection instruments. Appendix D: Prostitution, sex trafficking, and the military. Appendix E: Summary of demand tactics employed in each city and county. Appendix F: Sample “Dear John letters” from Raleigh. Appendix G: Portland prostitution exclusion zone ordinance. Appendix H: Documents from Indianapolis/Marion County “Red Zone” Program. Appendix I: Summary of John School program traits. Appendix J: Organizations addressing demand and supporting survivors. | ||
| 606 |
_aPROSTITUIÇÃO _9226370 |
||
| 606 |
_aTRÁFICO DE MULHERES _9262633 |
||
| 606 |
_aTRÁFICO DE JOVENS _9348796 |
||
| 606 |
_aEXPLORAÇÃO DE MENORES _9326676 |
||
| 606 |
_aPROGRAMA DE GOVERNO _9348544 |
||
| 606 |
_aPROGRAMA DE PREVENÇÃO CRIMINAL _9325843 |
||
| 606 |
_aESTADOS UNIDOS _9334103 |
||
| 710 |
_aA NATIONAL OVERVIEW OF PROSTITUTION AND SEX TRAFFICKING DEMAND REDUCTION EFFORTS _9356889 |
||
| 955 | _xOferta | ||