000			02949nam a2200277 4500
001			390947
090			_a390947
100			_a20120521d2012 y0pory50 ba
101			_aeng
200			_aApplication of laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy to forensic science _bRecurso eletrónico _eanalysis of paint samples _fMichael E. Sigman, Erin M. McIntee, Candice Bridge
210			_a[Orlando, FL] _ced. do a. _d2012
215			_a1 CD-ROM _d12 cm
300			_aResearch report submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice - Award ner. 2006-DN-BX-K251. Ficheiro de 1,22 MB em formato PDF (84 p.). Disponível também em. https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/237839.pdf. Acedido a 21 de maio de 2012.
330			_aExecutive summary. I. Introduction. I.1 Statement of problem. I.2 Literature citations and review. I.2.1 Forensic paint analysis. I.2.2 Laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS). II Methods. II.1 Data analysis methods. II.1.1 Multivariate Analysis of Variance (MANOVA). II.1.2 Full spectral comparisons. II.1.2.1 Parametric approaches. II.1.2.1.1 Pearson Correlation Spectral Comparison. II.1.2.1.2 Hit Quality Index (HQI). II.1.2.1.3 Distribution issues: II.1.2.2 Nonparametric approaches. II.1.2.2.1 Nonparametric permutation. II.1.2.2.2 Alternative nonparametric approaches. II.1.2.2.2.1 Spearman Rank Correlation: II.2 Experimental approach. II.2.1 X-ray fluorescence XRF. II.2.2 Laser ablation – Inductively coupled plasma – mass spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS). II.2.3 Scanning Electron Microscopy – Energy Dispersive Spectroscopy (SEM/EDS). II.2.4 Laser induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS). II.3 Samples analyzed. III. Results: III.1 XRF discrimination: III.1.1 ANOVA/Tukey HSD Data Analysis: III.2 SEM/EDS discrimination: III.2.1 ANOVA/Tukey HSD Data Analysis. III.2.2 SEM/EDS full spectra discrimination by student’s t-test/HQI. III.3 Laser Ablation – Inductively Coupled Plasma – Mass Spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS). III.4 LIBS discrimination. III.4.1 Laser Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy Discrimination (MANOVA). III.4.2 Laser Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy Discrimination (t-test). III.4.3 Laser Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy Discrimination (nonparametric permutation test). III.4.3.1 Nonparametric permutation discrimination of glass samples. III.4.3.2 Nonparametric permutation discrimination of paint samples. IV Conclusion: IV.1 Discussion of findings. IV.2 Implications for policy and practice. IV. 3 Implications for further research. V References.VI Dissemination of results.
606			_aANÁLISE DE TINTAS _9328471
606			_aESPECTROSCOPIA _9330125
606			_aANÁLISE LABORATORIAL _9326721
606			_aCIÊNCIA FORENSE _9321508
700			_aSIGMAN _bMichael E. _9356765
701			_aMCINTEE _bErin M. _9356766
701			_aBRIDGE _bCandice _9356767
955			_xOferta