000			03112nam a2200277 4500
001			390585
090			_a390585
100			_a20111014d2009 y0pory50 ba
101			_aeng
200			_aFacial identification guidance _bRecurso eletrónico
210			_aLondon _cNPIA ; ACPO _d2009
215			_a1 CD-ROM _d12 cm
300			_aProduced [by NPIA] on behalf of the Association of Chief Police Officers (ACPO). Ficheiro de 1,64 Mb em formato pdf (45 p.). Disponível em: https://npia.police.uk/en/docs/Facial_ID.pdf. Acedido em 18 de Janeiro de 2012.
330			_aPreface. Section 1 – Glossary of terms. 1.1 Introduction. 1.2 Composite likeness. 1.3 Recall and recognition. 1.4 Facial imaging officer. 1.5 Composite artist. 1.6 Forensic artist. 1.7 Cognitive interview. Section 2 – Facial imaging techniques. 2.1 Introduction. 2.1.1 Computerised facial imaging. 2.1.2 Artist composite. 2.1.3 Computerised or artist’s impression. 2.1.4 Post-mortem interpretation. 2.1.5 Facial reconstruction. 2.1.5.1 Two-dimensional reconstruction. 2.1.5.2 Three-dimensional reconstruction. 2.1.5.3 Computerised three-dimensional reconstruction. 2.1.6 Age progression of children.2.1.7 Image comparison. 2.1.7.1 Techniques. 2.1.7.2 Practitioner background and experience. 2.1.8 Morphing. 2.1.8.1 Methods. 2.1.8.2 Practitioner background and experience. Section 3 – Training. 3.1 Minimum standards. 3.1.1 Facial imaging officers and composite image artists. 3.1.2 Forensic artists. Section 4 – Working practices. 4.1. Exhibits. 4.1.1. Production of original exhibits. 4.1.2 Production of secondary exhibits. 4.2. Disclosure. 4.2.1 Material. 4.2.2 Retention of material. 4.3 Multiple images. 4.4 Security videos and stills. 4.5 Intelliqence circulation. 4.6 Authority to circulate composite images to the media. Section 5 – Witness considerations. 5.1 Video recording the facial composite process. 5.2 Witness availability. 5.3 Witness ability to provide a composite image. 5.3.1 Recall or composite methods. 5.3.2 Recognition or holistic methods. 5.3.3 Use of features. 5.3.4 Witness support. 5.4 Witness contamination. 5.5 Operator contamination. Section 6 – Legal framework. 6.1 Introduction. 6.2 Case law. 6.2.1 R v Virag (1969) and R v Dougherty (1973). 6.2.2 R v Percy Smith (1976) Crim LR 511. 6.3 Summary. Appendix 1 – Criteria required for submission for post-mortem interpretation. Appendix 2 – Criteria required for submission for facial reconstruction. Appendix 3 – Criteria for submission for facial image comparison. Appendix 4 –Criteria for production of a morphed composite. Appendix 5 – Further reading.
606			_aGUIA DE INFORMAÇÃO _91233
606			_aIDENTIFICAÇÃO DE PESSOAS _9343105
606			_aRECONSTITUIÇÃO FACIAL _9328354
606			_aIDENTIFICAÇÃO FACIAL _9344767
606			_aCIÊNCIA FORENSE _9321508
606			_aREINO UNIDO _9334328
710			_aREINO UNIDO _bNational Policing Improvement Agency _9334328
955			_xOferta