000			02402nam a2200337 4500
001			384187
010			_aISSN 10872221
090			_a384187
100			_a20070419d2005 y0pory50 ba
101			_aeng
200			_aEuropean constitutionalism and the European Arrest Warrant _bRecurso eletrónico _econtrapunctual principles in disharmony _fJan Komárek
210			_aNew York _cNew York University School of Law _d2005
215			_a1 CD-ROM _d12 cm
225			_aJean Monnet Working Paper _v10
300			_aThe Jean Monnet Program. Ficheiro de 301 Kb em formato pdf (29 p.). Disponível também em: https://www.jeanmonnetprogram.org/papers/05/051001.pdfAcedido em 19 de Abril de 2007.
330			_aI Introduction – national constitutional courts and their perspectives on the european constitutional order. II The EAW framework decision and the problem of extraditing own nationals. III The EAW framework decision and the polish constitutional tribunal: taking european commitments seriously?: A - surrender as a subset of extradition. B - Temporal limitation of the decision’s effects as a case of balancing competing principles. IV Federal constitutional court’s reservations to the mutual trust between the member states: A - The purpose of protecting german nationals from extraditing in the view of the FCC – rights stemming from the citizenship. B - FCC’s distrust to other member states’ criminal justice systems. V Contrapunctual law principles and the area of freedom, security and justice: A - The decisions in the light of principles of contrapunctual law. a) Pluralism, consistency and coherence, universalisability. b) Limits of contrapunctual law. c) Last principle: institutional choice as a way out? B - Contrapunctual law principles and the area of freedom, security andjustice. VI Conclusion.
606			_aMANDADO DE DETENÇÃO EUROPEU _911339
606			_aCONSTITUIÇÃO EUROPEIA _92131
606			_aTRIBUNAL CONSTITUCIONAL _9235428
606			_aJURISPRUDÊNCIA _9231071
606			_aDIREITO COMUNITÁRIO _9222680
606			_aDIREITO COMPARADO _9224769
606			_aPOLÓNIA _9333222
606			_aALEMANHA _9333241
700			_aKÓMAREK _bJan _944198
955			_xOferta