| 000 | 01363nam a2200205 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 377351 | ||
| 090 | _a377351 | ||
| 100 | _a20190212u y0pory50 ba | ||
| 101 | _aeng | ||
| 200 |
_aValidity of forensic odontology identification by comparison of conventionaldental radiographs _bRecurso eletrónico _ea scoping review _fSher-Lin Chiam ...[et al.] |
||
| 311 | _aFicheiro de 272 KB em formato PDF. | ||
| 330 | _a1. Introduction. 2. Method. 3. Results. 3.1. The type and number of radiographs used in the studies. 3.2. The method employed for comparison of the radiographs. 3.3. Types and numbers of participants in each of these studies. 3.4. The scale used for assessment. 3.5. Presence or absence of case information to aid the comparison of radiographs. 3.6. Specific research questions and specific area of focus in these studies. 3.7. Validity: accuracy and reliability results. 4. Discussion. 5. Conclusion. References. | ||
| 461 |
_cHarrogate _dJanuary 2019 _vVol. 59, n.º 1 _tScience & Justice _x1355-0306 _pp. 93-101 |
||
| 606 |
_aODONTOLOGIA FORENSE _9325951 |
||
| 606 |
_aIDENTIFICAÇÃO DE PESSOAS _9343105 |
||
| 606 |
_aCIÊNCIA FORENSE _9321508 |
||
| 710 |
_aVALIDITY OF FORENSIC ODONTOLOGY IDENTIFICATION BY COMPARISON OF CONVENTIONAL DENTAL RADIOGRAPHS _9351260 |
||