| 000 | 01357nam a2200229 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 375737 | ||
| 090 | _a375737 | ||
| 100 | _a20150304u y0pory50 ba | ||
| 101 | _aeng | ||
| 200 |
_aOf earprints, fingerprints, scent dogs, cot deaths and cognitive contamination _ea brief look at the present state of play in the forensic arena _fA. P. A. Broeders |
||
| 311 | _a(*) | ||
| 330 | _a1. Problems in assessing the weight of forensic evidence: some examples. 1.2. Semen in a rape case: ‘non-perpetrator trace’. 1.3. Fingerprints: ‘absolute identification’. 1.4. Scent lineup: ‘up in the air’. 1.5. Cot deaths and statistics. 1.6. Earprints versus DNA. 2. Forensic science under attack. 3. Forensic DNA analysis as a model. 4. Does forensic science qualify as science? 5. The traditional approach in forensic identification. 6. Rules of expert evidence. 7. Remedies. 8. Conclusion. Acknowledgements. | ||
| 461 |
_cAmsterdam _dJune 2006 _vVol. 159, nr. 2-3 _tForensic Science International _x0379-0738 _pp. 148-157 |
||
| 606 |
_aIDENTIFICAÇÃO BIOLÓGICA _9328871 |
||
| 606 |
_aIDENTIFICAÇÃO DE PESSOAS _9343105 |
||
| 606 |
_aDACTILOSCOPIA _9104133 |
||
| 606 |
_aANÁLISE DE VESTÍGIOS _9320649 |
||
| 606 |
_aADN _9243660 |
||
| 700 |
_aBROEDERS _bA. P. A. _9132780 |
||