| 000 | 01752nam a2200253 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 373484 | ||
| 090 | _a373484 | ||
| 100 | _a20080225u y0pory50 ba | ||
| 101 | _aeng | ||
| 200 |
_aRegulating prostitution _esocial inclusion, responsibilization and the politics of prostitution reform _fJane Scoular, Maggie O'Neill |
||
| 311 | _aResumo inserto no próprio artigo. | ||
| 330 | _aFollowing Matthews (2005) recent examination of prostitution's changing regulatory framework, we offer a critical account of the move from 'enforcement' (punishment) to 'multi-agency' (regulatory) responses as, in part, a consequence of new forms of governance. We focus on the increasing salience of exiting - a move favoured by Matthews as signalling a renewed welfare approach, but one which, when viewed in the wider context of 'progressive governance', offers insight into new labour's attempt to increase social control under the rhetoric of inclusion, through techniques of risk and responsibilization. By exploring the moral and political components of these techniques, we demonstrate how they operate to privilege and exclude certain forms of citizenship, augmenting the on-going hegemonic moral and political regulation of sex workers. | ||
| 461 |
_cOxford _dSeptember 2007 _vVol. 47, n. 5 _tBritish Journal of Criminology (The) _x0007-0955 _pp. 764-778 |
||
| 606 |
_aPROSTITUIÇÃO _9226370 |
||
| 606 |
_aSANÇÃO PENAL _9227850 |
||
| 606 |
_aLEGISLAÇÃO PENAL _9275821 |
||
| 606 |
_aINCLUSÃO SOCIAL _98334 |
||
| 606 |
_aMETODOLOGIAS _9341295 |
||
| 606 |
_aREINO UNIDO _9334328 |
||
| 700 |
_aSCOULAR _bJane _9292031 |
||
| 701 |
_aO'NEILL _bMaggie _9292032 |
||