| 000 | 01517nam a2200265 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 373440 | ||
| 090 | _a373440 | ||
| 100 | _a20080114u y0pory50 ba | ||
| 101 | _aeng | ||
| 200 |
_aThe pros and cons of life without parole _fCatherine Appleton, Bent Grover |
||
| 311 | _aResumo inserto no próprio artigo. | ||
| 330 | _aThe question of how societies should respond to their most serious crimes if not the death penalty is 'perhaps the oldest of all the issues raised by the two-century struggle in western civilization to end the death penalty' (Bedau, 1990: 481). In this article we draw attention to the rapid and extraordinary increase in the use of 'life imprisonment without parole' in the United States. We aim to critically asses the main arguments put forward by supporters of whole life imprisonment as a punishment provided by law to replace the death penalty and argue against life-long detention as the ultimate sanction. | ||
| 461 |
_cOxford _dJuly 2007 _vVol. 47, n. 4 _tBritish Journal of Criminology (The) _x0007-0955 _pp. 597-615 |
||
| 606 |
_aCRIME VIOLENTO _9321190 |
||
| 606 |
_aSANÇÃO PENAL _9227850 |
||
| 606 |
_aPENA DE MORTE _9747 |
||
| 606 |
_aLIBERDADE CONDICIONAL _9224956 |
||
| 606 |
_aESTADOS UNIDOS _9334103 |
||
| 700 |
_aAPPLETON _bCatherine _9290302 |
||
| 701 |
_aGROVER _bBent _9292017 |
||