| 000 | 01822nam a2200217 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 31517 | ||
| 010 | _a0275946509 | ||
| 090 | _a31517 | ||
| 100 | _a20120807d1994 y0pory50 ba | ||
| 101 | _aeng | ||
| 200 |
_aEmpowerment in dispute mediation _ea critical analysis of communication _fJonathan G. Shailor |
||
| 210 |
_aWestport, (etc.) _cPRAEGER _d1994 |
||
| 215 |
_aIX, 156p. _d24cm |
||
| 300 | _aFundo documental do GRAL | ||
| 330 | _a1- Introduction: Three faces of empowerment. A brief history of dispute mediation in United States. Empowerment and neutrality: problematic virtues in mediation practice. Conclusion. 2- Empowerment: a communication perspective. Theoretical perspective: the language game of mediation. Method. Conclusion. 3- Case study: Peter and Anne. Introduction. Description and interpretation of participant meanings explanation: logics in interaction. Critique: an assessment of empowerment. 4- Case study: Roy and Jane. Introduction. Description and interpretation of participant meanings explanation: logics in interaction. Critique: an assessment of empowerment. 5- Case study: May and Ally. Introduction. Description and interpretation of participant meanings explanation: logics in interaction. Critique: an assessment of empowerment. 6- Conclusion: a critique of empowerment in dispute mediation. Neutrality and empowerment. Expressive and utilitarian individuals. Empowerment and mediation model of conflict management. Implications. Appendix A: CMM interpretation of amediation manual. Appendix B: Experts fro mediation techniques (1984). | ||
| 606 |
_aMEDIAÇÃO _yEstados Unidos da América _9121605 |
||
| 700 |
_aSHAILOR _bJonathan _9121606 |
||
| 852 | _jMED_SHA | ||