| 000 | 01806nam a2200241 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 23095 | ||
| 090 | _a23095 | ||
| 100 | _a20100201c2009 y0pory50 ba | ||
| 101 | _aeng | ||
| 200 | _aRationalizing the use of electronic monitoring | ||
| 330 | _a- Two recent studies suggest that adding EM to the mix of treatment components can enhance public safety while reducing both the monetary and human costs of recidivism and incarceration. - In a few well-publicized cases, EM has permitted police to identify and eliminate potential suspects by real-time integration of police reports and GPS-recorded tracks of offender movements. If EM becomes more widespread, it could emerge as a tool of investigation. - In conventional evaluation research, arrests, revocations, and reconvictions are represented as failures. Yet some agency users of EM regard such "failures" as evidence that monitoring is actually succeeding. - People who have run EM monitoring centers develop a sense of what sorts of deviations from the norm will result in eventual failure. - At least in some situations, EM seems to be able to suppress criminal behavior for its duration. - The best prospect for use of EM as a tool for rehabilitation is in combination with other program elements carefully matched to offender characteristics and needs. | ||
| 461 |
_vV.22,n.1 _d2009 _pp.5-11 _tThe Journal of Offender Monitoring _cKingston |
||
| 606 |
_aDIREITO PROCESSUAL PENAL _9219 |
||
| 606 |
_aVIGILÂNCIA ELECTRÓNICA _92026 |
||
| 606 |
_aREINSERÇÃO SOCIAL _9693 |
||
| 606 |
_aCANADÁ _95046 |
||
| 700 |
_aRENZEMA _bMarc _9114197 |
||
| 852 | _jP.308 | ||