| 000 | 01620nam a2200289 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 22889 | ||
| 090 | _a22889 | ||
| 100 | _a20091109c2009 y0pory50 ba | ||
| 101 | _aeng | ||
| 200 | _aIs custody an effective sentencing option for the UK? Evidence from a meta-analysis of existing studies | ||
| 330 | _aPrison numbers in the UK are at record levels and continue to rise. The rise in prison numbers has led to a renewed focus on the relative effectiveness of different sentences and in particular the effectiveness of prison when compared to alternative, community-based, sentences. The aim of this research is to test the hypothesis that prisons are an effective means of reducing re-offending in the UK. A review of existing studies identified 91 estimates of the effect on re-offending of prison for adults when compared against alternative sentences and 15 estimates of the effect on re-offending of prisons for juveniles when compared against alternative sentences. | ||
| 461 |
_vV.56,n.2 _dJune 2009 _pp.129-151 _tProbation Journal _cLondon |
||
| 606 |
_aDIREITO PENITENCIÁRIO _9549 |
||
| 606 |
_aMEDIDAS DE EXECUÇÃO NA COMUNIDADE _9103542 |
||
| 606 |
_aMEDIDAS DETENTIVAS _95588 |
||
| 606 |
_aEFICÁCIA _918577 |
||
| 606 |
_aREINCIDÊNCIA _9741 |
||
| 700 |
_aMARSH _bKevin _919536 |
||
| 701 |
_aFOX _bChris _919537 |
||
| 701 |
_aSARMAH _bRashmi _9116293 |
||
| 852 | _jP.105 | ||