| 000 | 01505nam a2200253 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 22888 | ||
| 090 | _a22888 | ||
| 100 | _a20091109c2009 y0pory50 ba | ||
| 101 | _aeng | ||
| 200 |
_aHow not to assess probation performance _econstructing local reconviction rates |
||
| 330 | _aMuch of the responsibility for securing reductions in offending and reoffending is being devolved to local statutory services. It follows that robust and timely local measures for assessing reoffending must be created. To this end, for the last three years the National Offender Management Service has produced quarterly reconviction reports for individual probation areas based on 'snapshots' (cross-sectional samples) of the supervision caseload. An independent examination of the data for the East Midlands Region reveals that the way cases have been selected and followed-up departs from the conventions employed in all previous ('longitudinal') reconviction studies in England and Wales. | ||
| 461 |
_vV.56,n.2 _dJune 2009 _pp.111-127 _tProbation Journal _cLondon |
||
| 606 |
_aDIREITO PENITENCIÁRIO _9549 |
||
| 606 |
_aEXCUÇÃO DA PENA _9116292 |
||
| 606 |
_aMEDIDAS DE EXECUÇÃO NA COMUNIDADE _9103542 |
||
| 606 |
_aPROBATION _95123 |
||
| 606 |
_aREINCIDÊNCIA _9741 |
||
| 700 |
_aHEDDERMAN _bCarol _9111301 |
||
| 852 | _jP.105 | ||