000			01245nam a2200181 4500
001			19611
090			_a19611
100			_a20041108u y0pory50 ba
101			_aeng
200			_aThe What Works debate _ekeeping a human perspective
330			_aThis article, arising from the author's long experience of work in the probation service, was inspired by Peter Raynor's (2003) article "Evidence-based practice and its critics". It argues that the antipathy many probation staff have towards the What Works agenda is not necessarily a rejection of cognitive behavioural methods in themselves. Rather, in the politically driven rush to produce "results", it suggests that there has been a failure to take proper account of the importance of the individual and his or her complex needs. This is the probation officer's traditional strength and, it is argued, is something that Raynor's article fails to fully appreciate.
461			_vV.51,n.3 _dsep. 2004 _pp.248-252 _tProbation Journal _cLondon
606			_aWHAT WORKS COMPORTAMENTALISMO PROBATION SERVICE PROBATION OFFICER _9113351
700			_aATKINSON _bDavid _917581
852			_jP.105