| 000 | 01114nam a2200169 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 14772 | ||
| 090 | _a14772 | ||
| 100 | _a20010326u y0pory50 ba | ||
| 101 | _aeng | ||
| 200 |
_aWhat worked? a five year study of probationers' reconvictions _fMark Oldfield |
||
| 330 | _aDespite claims that prison 'works', incapacitating offenders whilst performing no worse than community sentences in terms of reconviction rates, a follow-up study of the reoffending of all offenders placed on probation in Kent in 1991 demonstrates the positive impact of supervision upon subsequent offending patterns and the negative effects of previous custodial sentences. Mark Oldfield,Research Officer in Kent Probation Service, analyses the complexity of the findings and suggests that provide a sustainable argument for the increased use of community penalties | ||
| 461 |
_vV.44,n.1 _dMar. 1997 _pp.2-10 _tProbation Journal _cLondon |
||
| 606 |
_aREINCIDÊNCIA EFEITOS DAS PENAS DADOS ESTATÍSTICOS _9109278 |
||
| 700 |
_aOLDFIELD _bMark _9109279 |
||
| 852 | _jP.105 | ||