| 000 | 00887nam a2200169 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 14748 | ||
| 090 | _a14748 | ||
| 100 | _a20010326u y0pory50 ba | ||
| 101 | _aeng | ||
| 200 |
_aImprisoned for debt _ewho protects the vulnerable? _fRona Epstein |
||
| 330 | _aThough enforcement procedures for non-payment of fines and local taxes are necessary, Rona Epstein of Coventry University's Division of Law argues that enforcement by imprisonment is not only inefficient, in that the sums owed are cancelled by committal, but operates without any of the safeguards which normally govern use of this remedy of last resort, so that we fail to protect vulnerable defaulters. | ||
| 461 |
_vV.44,n.2 _dJune 1997 _pp.92-95 _tProbation Journal _cLondon |
||
| 606 |
_aMULTA _96311 |
||
| 700 |
_aEPSTEIN _bRona _914727 |
||
| 852 | _jP.105 | ||