000			02080nam a2200337 4500
001			10010
010			_a9781909521513
090			_a10010
100			_a20170322d2015 y0pory50 ba
101			_aeng
200			_aBalancing security and dignity in prisons _ea framework for preventive monitoring _fAndrea Huber...[et.al.] _gorg. Penal Reform International
205			_aSecond edition
210			_aLondon _cPenal Reform International _d2015
215			_a21 p. _cil. _ddigitalizado
225			_aA detention monitoring tool resource
300			_aConsultado em 22 de março de 2017 https://cdn.penalreform.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/security-dignity-2nd-ed-v6.pdf
330			_aIn many countries, whether driven by political or media pressure for tighter security, a punitive approach to imprisonment, inadequate staff-prisoner ratios or a lack of training on inter-personal skills, de-escalation and mediation, prison management often takes unnecessary or disproportionate recourse to security measures in violation of detainees’ right to dignity.This paper aims to provide an analytical framework for detention monitoring bodies, including National Preventive Mechanisms, to support them to:understand the concepts of dignity and security in prisons and the relationship between themidentify situations where there is a particular risk that security is overemphasised to the detriment of the dignity of prisoners. These include: over-classification of prisoners, body searches, instruments of restraint, solitary confinement, and staff-prisoner relations.
606			_aDIREITO PENITENCIÁRIO _9549
606			_aVIGILÂNCIA _96397
606			_aPREVENÇÃO GERAL _95472
606			_aDIREITOS HUMANOS _93523
606			_aREGRAS DE NELSON MANDELA _910939
606			_aTORTURA _9746
700			_aHUBER _bAndrea _910948
701			_aBERNATH _bBarbara _9105625
701			_aALLEN _bRob _910971
701			_aDELAPLACE _bEdouard _9105626
710			_aPENAL REFORM INTERNATIONAL _910937
852			_j343.8HUB