What is securities fraud? [Recurso eletrónico] / Samuel W. Buell
In: Duke Law Journal.ISSN 0012-7086. Durham. V.61, nº 3 (December 2011) , p. 511-581Idioma: Inglês.Assunto: FRAUDE FINANCEIRA | INFORMAÇÃO PRIVILEGIADA | SEGURANÇA DE INFORMAÇÕES | PREVENÇÃO DA CORRUPÇÃO Resumo: Introduction. I. What is fraud?. A. The question is hard and important. B. Some axes of fraud. C. Mental state and fraud. 1. Core fraud versus misrepresentation. 2. Goal versus awareness. 3. Level of awareness. 4. Criminal fault. II. What is securities fraud?. A. structure of the statutory and regulatory scheme. B. Elements, according to the federal courts. C. The Scienter mess. 1. Private Lawsuits. 2. SEC actions. 3. Criminal prosecutions. D. Insider trading. E. Securities fraud remains undefined. III. Improving the law of securities fraud. A. Costs of the status quo. B. Objectives for reform. 1. Fraud and the purposes of securities regulation. 2. The civil-criminal line. 3. Capitalizing on expressive capital. C. Reform angels. 1. Amend the statutes and rules. 2. Repair the doctrine in the courts. Conclusion.| Item type | Current location | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analíticos de Periódicos | Biblioteca da Polícia Judiciária | Available |
(*).
Introduction. I. What is fraud?. A. The question is hard and important. B. Some axes of fraud. C. Mental state and fraud. 1. Core fraud versus misrepresentation. 2. Goal versus awareness. 3. Level of awareness. 4. Criminal fault. II. What is securities fraud?. A. structure of the statutory and regulatory scheme. B. Elements, according to the federal courts. C. The Scienter mess. 1. Private Lawsuits. 2. SEC actions. 3. Criminal prosecutions. D. Insider trading. E. Securities fraud remains undefined. III. Improving the law of securities fraud. A. Costs of the status quo. B. Objectives for reform. 1. Fraud and the purposes of securities regulation. 2. The civil-criminal line. 3. Capitalizing on expressive capital. C. Reform angels. 1. Amend the statutes and rules. 2. Repair the doctrine in the courts. Conclusion.
There are no comments for this item.