<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="https://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="https://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim https://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="https://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>01302     2200241   4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">408225</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="011" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">0265-5527</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="090" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">408225</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">20231229d        kkky0pory50      ba</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="101" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">eng</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="102" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">GB</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="200" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">A future for probation?</subfield>
    <subfield code="f">John Deering</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="330" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">The probation service in England and Wales faces what is the greatest challenge in its history. It is currently facing a future which is being shaped by four competing and differing forces: its current case management approach as influenced by moves to more law-enforcement practices; theories of desistance; new developments in offender engagement; and the emergence of Payment by Results (PbR). The article considers each of these influences and discusses how important they may be to the future of probation practice, concluding that the future of the service may be unrecognisable from anything that has gone before</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="461" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">Oxford</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">2014</subfield>
    <subfield code="p">p. 1 a 15</subfield>
    <subfield code="t">The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice </subfield>
    <subfield code="v">Vol. 53, n&#xBA; 1, (February)</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="606" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">PROBATION</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="606" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">LIBERDADE CONDICIONAL</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="606" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">REINSER&#xC7;&#xC3;O SOCIAL</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="675" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">343.8</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Deering</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">John </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="801" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">PT</subfield>
    <subfield code="g">RPC</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="852" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="j">343.8DEE</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="995" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="1">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="4">343_000000000000000_8DEE</subfield>
    <subfield code="5">2023-12-29</subfield>
    <subfield code="6">9263</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">479712</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">DGRSP</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">DGRSP</subfield>
    <subfield code="f">DGRSP9263</subfield>
    <subfield code="k">343.8DEE</subfield>
    <subfield code="n">2023-12-29</subfield>
    <subfield code="o">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="r">AP</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
