<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="https://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="https://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim https://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="https://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>01712     2200229   4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">408134</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="090" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">408134</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">20231124d        kkky0pory50      ba</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="101" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">eng</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="102" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">US</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="200" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Can electronic performance monitoring be fair?</subfield>
    <subfield code="e">exploring relationships among monitoring characteristics, perceived fairness, and job performance</subfield>
    <subfield code="f">Robert H. Moorman, Deborah L. Wells</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="330" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">With the increased use of technology in all areas of human resource management, many organizations are using electronic and
computerized means for monitoring and assessing employee performance. We tested three path models that explored whether the perception of certain characteristics of an electronic performance monitoring (EPM) system might relate to 1) the perceived fairness of that system and 2) employee performance. Results suggest that perceptions of three of the characteristics &amp;ndash;
opportunity to challenge, feedback tone, and amount of monitoring were related to the perceived fairness of the performance monitoring system. In turn, perceived fairness of the system fully mediated the relationship between the monitoring system characteristics and dimensions of contextual performance. However, the bestfitting path model did not support any linkages to
task performance.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="461" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="d">2003</subfield>
    <subfield code="p">p. 2-16</subfield>
    <subfield code="t">Journal of Leadership and Organizational  Studies</subfield>
    <subfield code="v">V.10, n&#xBA; 2</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">Omaha</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="606" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">VIGIL&#xC2;NCIA ELETR&#xD3;NICA</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="606" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">MONITORIZA&#xC7;&#xC3;O ELETR&#xD3;NICA</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="675" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">343.26</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a"> Moorman</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">Robert H. </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="701" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Wells</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">Deborah L. </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="801" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">PT</subfield>
    <subfield code="g">RPC</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="852" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="j">VE81</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="995" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="1">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="4">VE_81_000000000000000</subfield>
    <subfield code="5">2023-11-24</subfield>
    <subfield code="6">9215</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">479622</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">DGRSP</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">DGRSP</subfield>
    <subfield code="f">DGRSP9215</subfield>
    <subfield code="k">VE81</subfield>
    <subfield code="n">2023-11-24</subfield>
    <subfield code="o">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="r">AP</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
