02111nam a2200169 4500001000700000100004100007101000800048200019700056210011200253215001900365300015300384330117100537606003201708606001601740606002901756710015601785394680 a20170823d2014 y0pory50 ba aeng aPerformance evaluation and utility assessment of magneto-optical sensor technology for detecting and visualizing obliterated serial numbers in firearmsbRecurso eletrónicofRTI International aWashington, DCcForensic Technology Center of Excellence (FTCoE). National Institute of Justice (NIJ)d2014 a1CD-ROMd12 cm aresearch report submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice. FY2011 Award number: 2011-DN-BX-K564. Ficheiro de 1,52 MB em formato PDF (31 p.). a1. Introduction. 2. Magneto–Optical (MO) Sensor Technology. 2.1 MO Sensor Concept. 2.2 MO Sensor Technology Tested. 2.2.1 How it works- 2.2.2 Availability. 3. Performance assessment. 3.1 Technical performance factors as defined for this project. 3.2 Non–technical performance factors as defined for this project. 4. Experimental design. 4.1 Methodology. 5. Performance testing. 6. Performance evaluation. 6.1 Magnetic particle inspection. 6.2 Comparison: MO Sensor and MPI. 6.3 Comparison: MO Sensor and Chemical Etching. 7. Lessons learned. 7.1 Sensor design issues. 7.2 MO Sensor selection considerations. 7.3 MO Sensor technology limitations. 7.4 Need for future development and testing. 8. Conclusions. 9. Bibliography. Appendix A: MO Sensor steel serial number detection and visualization. Appendix B: MPI Steel serial number detection and visualization. Appendix C: Chemical etching steel serial number detection and visualization. Appendix D: Chemical etching other substrate serial number detection and visualization. Appendix E: Derivation of MO vs MPI contingency table values. Appendix F: Derivation of MO vs chemical etching contingency table values. aARMA DE FOGO E MUNIÇÕES aBALÍSTICA aANÁLISE DE VESTÍGIOS aPERFORMANCE EVALUATION AND UTILITY ASSESSMENT OF MAGNETO-OPTICAL SENSOR TECHNOLOGY FOR DETECTING AND VISUALIZING OBLITERATED SERIAL NUMBERS IN FIREARMS