02914nam a2200241   4500001000700000090001100007100004100018101000800059200017800067210007900245215002000324300015100344330181400495606002302309606003502332606003702367606003002404606005102434700002702485701003102512955001102543995011802554393195  a393195  a20150416d2013       y0pory50      ba  aeng  aThe acquisition of sebaceous fingerprint topology using Columnar Thin Films (CTF) on forensically relevant substratesbRecurso eletrónicofRobert Shaler, Akhlesh Lakhtakia  a[Rockville, MD]cNational Criminal Justice Reference Service (NCJRS)d2013  a1 CD-ROMd12 cm  aFinal technical report submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice. NIJ Award Number: 2010-DN-BX-K232. Ficheiro de 2,41 MB em formato PDF (57 p.).  aExecutive summary. Purpose. Research design. Findings and conclusions. Data analysis. Implications for policy and practice. Main body. I. Introduction. I.1. Statement of the problem. I.2. Literature review. I.2.1. Nonporous substrates: Metals, handles of weapons (plastics & wood), adhesive tapes. I.2.2. Porous substrates. I.2.3. Environmental stress and ageing. I.2.4. Partial bloody prints. I.2.5. CTF technology. I.2.6. Pitfalls. I.3. Statement of hypothesis or rationale for the research. II. Methods. II.1. General overview and research design. II.2. Initial comprehensive study. II.2.1. Forensically relevant substrates. II.2.2. Fingerprint collection procedure. II.2.3. Evaporant materials. II.2.4. Optimization of CTF development. II.2.5. Selected traditional development techniques. II.2.6. Imaging of fingerprints. II.2.7. Subjective grading of fingerprints. II.3. Depleted fingerprint series. II.4. Partial bloody fingerprints. II.5. Discharged cartridge casings. II.6. Fluorescent evaporant materials. II.7. Preliminary comparison of CTF technique with VMD. II.8. Objective fingerprint grading system. III. Results. III.1. Statement of results. III.1.1. Initial comprehensive study. III.1.1.1. Phase I: Optimization of CTF development. III.1.1.2. Phase II: Comparison with selected traditional development techniques. III.1.2. Depleted fingerprint series. III.1.3. Partial bloody fingerprints. III.1.4. Discharged cartridge casings. III.1.5. Fluorescent evaporant materials.  III.1.6. Objective fingerprint grading system. III.1.7. Preliminary comparison of CTF technique with VMD. III.2. Tables. III.3. Figures. IV. Conclusions. IV.1. Discussion of findings. IV.2. Implication for policy and practice. IV.3. Implication for future research. V. References. VI. Dissemination of research findings.  aLOFOSCOPIA9320264  aANÁLISE LABORATORIAL9326721  aANÁLISE DE VESTÍGIOS9320649  aCIÊNCIA FORENSE9321508  aTÉCNICA DE INVESTIGAÇÃO CRIMINAL9343118  aSHALERbRobert9357687  aLAKHTAKIAbAkhlesh9357688  xOferta  104PJCD_258_00000000000000052022-06-066PJCD2589425633aPJcPJfPJ1CD258_15kPJCD258n2022-06-06o0rMOxOferta