01930nam a2200253   4500001000700000090001100007100004100018101000800059200014700067210004200214215002000256225002200276300017700298330084000475606003901315606003601354606003701390606002701427606002001454700003101474701004201505955001101547995011801558391674  a391674  a20130429d2011       y0pory50      ba  aeng  aTypologies of crime in the Argentine provincesbRecurso eletrónicoea panel study 2000-2008fAna María Cerro, Antonio Rodríguez Andrés  a[Tucumán ; Aarhus]ced. do a.d2011  a1 CD-ROMd12 cm  aMPRA Paperv44460  aResumo inserto na publicação. Ficheiro de 294 KB em formato PDF (25 p.). Disponível também em: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/44460/. Acedido a 29 de Abril de 2013.  aThis study examines the socioeconomic and deterrence determinants of crime in Argentina for different typologies of property crimes and crimes against person. We employ a panel of Argentinean regions over the years 2000-2008. Our econometric methodology follows GMM estimator commonly applied for dynamic panel data model. The results give evidence that unemployment has a positive and significant effect on total and property crimes but its impact depends on the typology of the offense. However it has no effect on crimes against person. The importance and the sign of Income per capita depend on the typology of the crime. Income inequality proved to be less important whenexplaining property crimes and crimes against person. The deterrence effects proxied by the arrest and sentence rates are always negative and very significant.  aCRIME CONTRA A PROPRIEDADE9244963  aCRIME CONTRA AS PESSOAS9320837  aESTATÍSTICAS CRIMINAIS9343078  aANÁLISE SOCIAL93558  aARGENTINA95067  aCERRObAna María9357061  aRODRÍGUEZ ANDRÉSbAntonio9357062  xOferta  104PJCD_223_00000000000000052022-06-066PJCD2239423786aPJcPJfPJ1CD223_25kPJCD223n2022-06-06o0rMOxOferta