03416nam a2200217   4500001000700000100004100007101000800048200015100056210003500207215002000242300028700262330238100549606002102930606002602951606002402977606003003001606002403031606003903055606001903094710008503113391200  a20121012d2012       y0pory50      ba  aeng  aA national overview of prostitution and sex trafficking demand reduction effortsbRecurso eletrónicoefinal reportfMichael Shively ... [et al.]  aCambridge, MAced. do a.d2012  a1 CD-ROMd12 cm  aResearch report submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice (NIJ), Award n. 2008-IJ-CX-0010. Ficheiro de 6,50 MB em formato PDF (244 p.). Disponível também em: https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/238796.pdf. Acedido a 12 ed outubro de 2012.  aExecutive summary. Project background and objectives. Purpose and structure of this report. Data collection. Key findings. Findings from literature review. Findings from national assessment data collection. History of demand reduction approaches pursued in the U.S. Key innovations. Costs of interventions. Need for improved access to information. Other key findings. Additional information available on demandforum.net. Acknowledgments. 1. Introduction. 2. Prostitution, Sex Trafficking, and Demand. Illegal commercial sex markets. Demand: men’s decisions to buy sex. Prostitution, sex trafficking, and harm. Stratification of the commercial sex industry. Human trafficking and prostitution. Vulnerable women and girls drawn into prostitution. Impact on “providers”. Impact on “consumers”. Impact on communities. Burden on law enforcement and other public services. Challenges in constraining supply & distribution. 3. Tactics used to combat demand in the United States. A typology of demand reduction programs and practices. The prevalence and first known use of demand reduction tactics in the United States. Public education & awareness programs. Reverse stings. Street-level reverse stings. Web-based reverse stings. Shaming. “Dear John” letters. Vehicle seizure. Driver’s license suspension. Geographic restraining (“SOAP”) orders. Neighborhood action. Surveillance cameras. Community service. John Schools. Generic John School logic model. Targeting the educational intervention. Prevalence of John School programs. Community impact panels. John School curriculum items. Common misconceptions about John Schools. Additional observations about John Schools.  4. Discussion. Description versus Evaluation. Demand-reduction is primary prevention. Combating demand: major needs and opportunities. Appendices. Appendix A: Bibliography. Appendix B: Research method. Appendix C: Data collection instruments. Appendix D: Prostitution, sex trafficking, and the military. Appendix E: Summary of demand tactics employed in each city and county. Appendix F: Sample “Dear John letters” from Raleigh. Appendix G: Portland prostitution exclusion zone ordinance. Appendix H: Documents from Indianapolis/Marion County “Red Zone” Program. Appendix I: Summary of John School program traits. Appendix J: Organizations addressing demand and supporting survivors.  aPROSTITUIÇÃO  aTRÁFICO DE MULHERES  aTRÁFICO DE JOVENS  aEXPLORAÇÃO DE MENORES  aPROGRAMA DE GOVERNO  aPROGRAMA DE PREVENÇÃO CRIMINAL  aESTADOS UNIDOS  aA NATIONAL OVERVIEW OF PROSTITUTION AND SEX TRAFFICKING DEMAND REDUCTION EFFORTS