<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="https://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="https://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim https://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="https://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>02949nam a2200277   4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">390947</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="090" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">390947</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">20120521d2012       y0pory50      ba</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="101" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">eng</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="200" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Application of laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy to forensic science</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">Recurso eletr&#xF3;nico</subfield>
    <subfield code="e">analysis of paint samples</subfield>
    <subfield code="f">Michael E. Sigman, Erin M. McIntee, Candice Bridge</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="210" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">[Orlando, FL]</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">ed. do a.</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">2012</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="215" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">1 CD-ROM</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">12 cm</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Research report submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice - Award ner. 2006-DN-BX-K251. Ficheiro de 1,22 MB em formato PDF (84 p.). Dispon&#xED;vel tamb&#xE9;m em. https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/237839.pdf. Acedido a 21 de maio de 2012.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="330" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Executive summary. I. Introduction. I.1 Statement of problem. I.2 Literature citations and review. I.2.1 Forensic paint analysis. I.2.2 Laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS). II Methods. II.1 Data analysis methods. II.1.1 Multivariate Analysis of Variance (MANOVA). II.1.2 Full spectral comparisons. II.1.2.1 Parametric approaches. II.1.2.1.1 Pearson Correlation Spectral Comparison. II.1.2.1.2 Hit Quality Index (HQI). II.1.2.1.3 Distribution issues: II.1.2.2 Nonparametric approaches. II.1.2.2.1 Nonparametric permutation. II.1.2.2.2 Alternative nonparametric approaches. II.1.2.2.2.1 Spearman Rank Correlation: II.2 Experimental approach. II.2.1 X-ray fluorescence XRF. II.2.2 Laser ablation &#x2013; Inductively coupled plasma &#x2013; mass spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS). II.2.3 Scanning Electron Microscopy &#x2013; Energy Dispersive Spectroscopy (SEM/EDS). II.2.4 Laser induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS). II.3 Samples analyzed. III. Results: III.1 XRF discrimination: III.1.1 ANOVA/Tukey HSD Data Analysis: III.2 SEM/EDS discrimination: III.2.1 ANOVA/Tukey HSD Data Analysis. III.2.2 SEM/EDS full spectra discrimination by student&#x2019;s t-test/HQI. III.3 Laser Ablation &#x2013; Inductively Coupled Plasma &#x2013; Mass Spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS). III.4 LIBS discrimination. III.4.1 Laser Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy Discrimination (MANOVA).  III.4.2 Laser Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy Discrimination (t-test).  III.4.3 Laser Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy Discrimination (nonparametric permutation test). III.4.3.1 Nonparametric permutation discrimination of glass samples. III.4.3.2 Nonparametric permutation discrimination of paint samples. IV Conclusion: IV.1 Discussion of findings. IV.2 Implications for policy and practice. IV. 3 Implications for further research. V References.VI Dissemination of results.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="606" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">AN&#xC1;LISE DE TINTAS</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">328471</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="606" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">ESPECTROSCOPIA</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">330125</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="606" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">AN&#xC1;LISE LABORATORIAL</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">326721</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="606" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">CI&#xCA;NCIA FORENSE</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">321508</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">SIGMAN</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">Michael E.</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">356765</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="701" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">MCINTEE</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">Erin M.</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">356766</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="701" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">BRIDGE</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">Candice</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">356767</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="955" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="x">Oferta</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="995" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="1">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="4">PJCD_200_000000000000000</subfield>
    <subfield code="5">2022-06-06</subfield>
    <subfield code="6">PJCD200</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">422810</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">PJ</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">PJ</subfield>
    <subfield code="f">PJ1CD200_33</subfield>
    <subfield code="k">PJCD200</subfield>
    <subfield code="n">2022-06-06</subfield>
    <subfield code="o">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="r">MO</subfield>
    <subfield code="x">Oferta</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
