03112nam a2200277 4500 390585 390585 20111014d2009 y0pory50 ba eng Facial identification guidance Recurso eletrónico London NPIA ; ACPO 2009 1 CD-ROM 12 cm Produced [by NPIA] on behalf of the Association of Chief Police Officers (ACPO). Ficheiro de 1,64 Mb em formato pdf (45 p.). Disponível em: https://npia.police.uk/en/docs/Facial_ID.pdf. Acedido em 18 de Janeiro de 2012. Preface. Section 1 – Glossary of terms. 1.1 Introduction. 1.2 Composite likeness. 1.3 Recall and recognition. 1.4 Facial imaging officer. 1.5 Composite artist. 1.6 Forensic artist. 1.7 Cognitive interview. Section 2 – Facial imaging techniques. 2.1 Introduction. 2.1.1 Computerised facial imaging. 2.1.2 Artist composite. 2.1.3 Computerised or artist’s impression. 2.1.4 Post-mortem interpretation. 2.1.5 Facial reconstruction. 2.1.5.1 Two-dimensional reconstruction. 2.1.5.2 Three-dimensional reconstruction. 2.1.5.3 Computerised three-dimensional reconstruction. 2.1.6 Age progression of children.2.1.7 Image comparison. 2.1.7.1 Techniques. 2.1.7.2 Practitioner background and experience. 2.1.8 Morphing. 2.1.8.1 Methods. 2.1.8.2 Practitioner background and experience. Section 3 – Training. 3.1 Minimum standards. 3.1.1 Facial imaging officers and composite image artists. 3.1.2 Forensic artists. Section 4 – Working practices. 4.1. Exhibits. 4.1.1. Production of original exhibits. 4.1.2 Production of secondary exhibits. 4.2. Disclosure. 4.2.1 Material. 4.2.2 Retention of material. 4.3 Multiple images. 4.4 Security videos and stills. 4.5 Intelliqence circulation. 4.6 Authority to circulate composite images to the media. Section 5 – Witness considerations. 5.1 Video recording the facial composite process. 5.2 Witness availability. 5.3 Witness ability to provide a composite image. 5.3.1 Recall or composite methods. 5.3.2 Recognition or holistic methods. 5.3.3 Use of features. 5.3.4 Witness support. 5.4 Witness contamination. 5.5 Operator contamination. Section 6 – Legal framework. 6.1 Introduction. 6.2 Case law. 6.2.1 R v Virag (1969) and R v Dougherty (1973). 6.2.2 R v Percy Smith (1976) Crim LR 511. 6.3 Summary. Appendix 1 – Criteria required for submission for post-mortem interpretation. Appendix 2 – Criteria required for submission for facial reconstruction. Appendix 3 – Criteria for submission for facial image comparison. Appendix 4 –Criteria for production of a morphed composite. Appendix 5 – Further reading. GUIA DE INFORMAÇÃO 1233 IDENTIFICAÇÃO DE PESSOAS 343105 RECONSTITUIÇÃO FACIAL 328354 IDENTIFICAÇÃO FACIAL 344767 CIÊNCIA FORENSE 321508 REINO UNIDO 334328 REINO UNIDO National Policing Improvement Agency 334328 Oferta 0 PJCD_184_000000000000000 2022-06-06 PJCD184 422324 PJ PJ PJ1CD184_11 PJCD184 2022-06-06 0 MO Oferta