02871nam a2200205   4500001000700000100004100007101000800048200005700056210003000113215002000143300022500163330206600388606002702454606003302481606003002514606002902544606002202573606001602595710005402611390585  a20111014d2009       y0pory50      ba  aeng  aFacial identification guidancebRecurso eletrónico  aLondoncNPIA ; ACPOd2009  a1 CD-ROMd12 cm  aProduced [by NPIA] on behalf of the Association of Chief Police Officers (ACPO). Ficheiro de 1,64 Mb em formato pdf (45 p.). Disponível em: https://npia.police.uk/en/docs/Facial_ID.pdf. Acedido em 18 de Janeiro de 2012.  aPreface. Section 1 – Glossary of terms. 1.1 Introduction. 1.2 Composite likeness. 1.3 Recall and recognition. 1.4 Facial imaging officer. 1.5 Composite artist. 1.6 Forensic artist. 1.7 Cognitive interview. Section 2 – Facial imaging techniques. 2.1 Introduction. 2.1.1 Computerised facial imaging. 2.1.2 Artist composite. 2.1.3 Computerised or artist’s impression. 2.1.4 Post-mortem interpretation. 2.1.5 Facial reconstruction. 2.1.5.1 Two-dimensional reconstruction. 2.1.5.2 Three-dimensional reconstruction. 2.1.5.3 Computerised three-dimensional reconstruction. 2.1.6 Age progression of children.2.1.7 Image comparison. 2.1.7.1 Techniques. 2.1.7.2 Practitioner background and experience. 2.1.8 Morphing. 2.1.8.1 Methods. 2.1.8.2 Practitioner background and experience. Section 3 – Training. 3.1 Minimum standards. 3.1.1 Facial imaging officers and composite image artists. 3.1.2 Forensic artists. Section 4 – Working practices. 4.1. Exhibits. 4.1.1. Production of original exhibits. 4.1.2 Production of secondary exhibits. 4.2. Disclosure. 4.2.1 Material. 4.2.2 Retention of material. 4.3 Multiple images. 4.4 Security videos and stills. 4.5 Intelliqence circulation. 4.6 Authority to circulate composite images to the media. Section 5 – Witness considerations. 5.1 Video recording the facial composite process. 5.2 Witness availability. 5.3 Witness ability to provide a composite image. 5.3.1 Recall or composite methods. 5.3.2 Recognition or holistic methods. 5.3.3 Use of features. 5.3.4 Witness support. 5.4 Witness contamination. 5.5 Operator contamination. Section 6 – Legal framework. 6.1 Introduction. 6.2 Case law. 6.2.1 R v Virag (1969) and R v Dougherty (1973). 6.2.2 R v Percy Smith (1976) Crim LR 511. 6.3 Summary. Appendix 1 – Criteria required for submission for post-mortem interpretation. Appendix 2 – Criteria required for submission for facial reconstruction. Appendix 3 – Criteria for submission for facial image comparison. Appendix 4 –Criteria for production of a morphed composite. Appendix 5 – Further reading.  aGUIA DE INFORMAÇÃO  aIDENTIFICAÇÃO DE PESSOAS  aRECONSTITUIÇÃO FACIAL  aIDENTIFICAÇÃO FACIAL  aCIÊNCIA FORENSE  aREINO UNIDO  aREINO UNIDObNational Policing Improvement Agency