<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="https://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="https://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim https://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="https://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>03406nam a2200289   4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">390311</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="010" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">9789287162267</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="090" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">390311</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">20110603d2007       y0pory50      ba</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="101" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">eng</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="200" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Cyberterrorism</subfield>
    <subfield code="e">the use of the internet for terrorist purposes</subfield>
    <subfield code="f">Council of Europe</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="210" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Strasbourg</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">Council of Europe</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">2007</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="215" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">497 p.</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">24 cm</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="330" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Foreword. Analytical report. Executive Summary. Introduction. I. Threat analysis: use of the internet for terrorist purposes and cyberterrorism. A. Attacks via the Internet. 1. Attacks on infrastructure. 2. Attacks on human life. B. Dissemination of content. 1. Presentation of terrorist views. 2. Propaganda and threats. 3. Recruitment and training. 4. Fundraising and financing. C. Use of the internet for other purposes. 1. Individual communication. 2. The internet as a planning and support instrument. D. Conclusions. II. Legal and policy evaluation: international co-operation against terrorist use of the internet. A. Overview. 1. The need for international co-operation. 2. Aim, method, and structure of the following analysis. B. Developing and harmonising national substantive criminal law. 1. Destructive attacks carried out by means of the internet. 2. Dissemination of illegal content. 3. Use of the internet for other purposes. C. Developing and harmonising national criminal procedure and preventive measures. 1. Computer-specific investigations. 2. Financial investigations. 3. Terrorist-specific investigations. 4. Evaluation and consequences for legal policy. D. Improving international co-operation. 1. Co-operation in computer-specific cases. 2. Co-operation in cases of money laundering and the financing of terrorism. 3. Co-operation in terrorist cases. 4. Co-operation in general cases. 5. Evaluation and consequences for legal policy. III. Conclusions. A. Use of the internet for terrorist purposes. B. Applicability of existing conventions. C. General problems of existing conventions. D. New efforts with respect to illegal content. References. National reports : Armenia, Austria, Belgium, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Germany, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Moldova, Norway, Portugal, Romania, Russian Federation, Slovak Republic, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, &#x201C;The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia&#x201D;, Turkey, United Kingdom, Mexico, United States of America. Selected Council of Europe reference texts: Council of Europe Convention on the Prevention of Terrorism (CETS No. 196). Explanatory Report. European Convention on Cybercrime (ETS No. 185). Explanatory Report. Parliamentary Assembly Recommendation 1706 (2005) on media and terrorism. Parliamentary Assembly Recommendation 1565 (2007). How to prevent cybercrime against state institutions in member and observer states.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="606" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">TERRORISMO</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">410420</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="606" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">CRIME VIA INTERNET</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">322772</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="606" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">CRIME INFORM&#xC1;TICO</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">301395</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="606" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">COOPERA&#xC7;&#xC3;O POLICIAL INTERNACIONAL</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">288328</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="606" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">POL&#xCD;TICA DE COOPERA&#xC7;&#xC3;O</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">273964</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="606" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">LEGISLA&#xC7;&#xC3;O ANTI-TERRORISTA</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">348036</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="606" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">INSTRUMENTO INTERNACIONAL</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">349242</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="606" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">CONSELHO DA EUROPA</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">227190</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="710" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">CONSELHO DA EUROPA</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">227190</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="955" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="x">Compra (54,38 &#x20AC;)</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="995" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="1">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="4">PJ_21_000000000000000_C_22</subfield>
    <subfield code="5">2022-06-06</subfield>
    <subfield code="6">PJ31936</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">421965</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">PJ</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">PJ</subfield>
    <subfield code="f">PJ131936</subfield>
    <subfield code="k">PJ21.C.22</subfield>
    <subfield code="n">2022-06-06</subfield>
    <subfield code="o">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="p">54.00</subfield>
    <subfield code="r">MO</subfield>
    <subfield code="x">Compra </subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
