<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="https://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="https://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim https://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="https://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>07848nam a2200349   4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">387409</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="090" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">387409</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">20090112d2008       y0pory50      ba</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="101" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">eng</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="200" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Measuring performance in criminal investigation</subfield>
    <subfield code="e">a knowledge-based activity</subfield>
    <subfield code="f">Nuno M. Guita</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="210" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">[S.l.]</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">ed. do aut.</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">2008</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="215" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">ix, 148 p.</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">il.</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">30 cm</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Disserta&#xE7;&#xE3;o de Mestrado apresentada no "MSc in Security and Risk Management" (Mestrado em Gest&#xE3;o de Risco e Seguran&#xE7;a), do Department of Criminology da University of Leicester, no Reino Unido. Resumo do autor. (*)Ficheiro de 6,49 Mb em PDF.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="330" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">"Measuring performance in criminal investigation - A knowledge-based activity" (Avalia&#xE7;&#xE3;o de desempenho em investiga&#xE7;&#xE3;o criminal - uma actividade baseada no conhecimento). "A escassez de literatura espec&#xED;fica de investiga&#xE7;&#xE3;o criminal bem como o dom&#xED;nio das teorias cl&#xE1;ssicas de gest&#xE3;o (quer cient&#xED;ficas quer 'behavioristas') na gest&#xE3;o policial t&#xEA;m determinado as pr&#xE1;ticas correntes dos gestores de pol&#xED;cia criminal. Por outro lado, melhorar os n&#xED;veis de desempenho investigat&#xF3;rio tem sido um objectivo comum &#xE0;s diversas reformas de pol&#xED;cia. Embora avalie a falta de desempenho, este estudo procura testar a aplicabilidade, do paradigma, relativamente recente, da gest&#xE3;o do conhecimento na investiga&#xE7;&#xE3;o criminal policial. A diferencia&#xE7;&#xE3;o paradigm&#xE1;tica entre o trabalho manual e do conhecimento &#xE9; testada e incorporada no &#xE2;mbito das actividades de pol&#xED;cia complexas e de rotina. Os dados emp&#xED;ricos recolhidos mostram a percep&#xE7;&#xE3;o que os gestores de investiga&#xE7;&#xE3;o criminal t&#xEA;m das dimens&#xF5;es de desempenho nessa actividade e demonstram as contradi&#xE7;&#xF5;es e tens&#xF5;es resultantes das pr&#xE1;ticas de gest&#xE3;o cl&#xE1;ssica quando aplicadas a investigadores criminais que t&#xEA;m uma auto-percep&#xE7;&#xE3;o de 'trabalhador do conhecimento'. Por fim, para efeitos de avalia&#xE7;&#xE3;o de desempenho e outros fins, sugere-se uma mudan&#xE7;a paradigm&#xE1;tica da gest&#xE3;o cl&#xE1;ssica na investiga&#xE7;&#xE3;o criminal para a gest&#xE3;o baseada no conhecimento." &#xCD;ndice: Acknowledgements. Abstract. Abbreviations. Chapter I - Evaluating what performance? 1. Introduction. 2. The problem. 3. The arguments. 4. Opposing paradigms. 5. Study aims and objectives. 5.1 - Study progression. Chapter II - Applying theories. 1. Knowledge management. 1.1. Knowledge in organisations. 1.2. What knowledge? 1.2.1. Individual knowledge. 1.2.1.1. Tacit knowledge. 1.2.2. Knowledge creation. 1.2.3. The role of knowledge - from data to information and intelligence. 1.2.4. Defining knowledge. 1.3. Knowledge-based activities. 1.3.1. Categories within knowledge work. 1.3.2. Knowledge-work productivity concept. 1.4. The knowledge worker. 2. Criminal investigation within policing. 2.1. The criminal investigation process. 2.2. The scientific method in criminal investigations. 2.3. The detective as knowledge worker. 3. Performance assessment. 3.1. Performance in knowledge work 3.2. Performance assessment in policing. 3.2.1. Performance in criminal investigation. 3.3. Contextual setting - the case of the Pol&#xED;cia Judici&#xE1;ria. 3.3.1. Prospects for the new model for performance assessment in Portuguese public services. 4. Concluding note. Chapter III - Criminal investigation in the Portuguese context. 1. A historical synopsis. 1.1. The origins in the 19th century. 1.2. Development after the monarchy. 1.3. Organizational modernity after WWII. 2. Contemporary organizational structure. 3. The Portuguese criminal investigation system. 3.1. The model of functional dependency. 4. The new order in the 21st century. 4.1. Organisational reengineering. 5. The culture of criminal investigation. 5.1. Action from culture. 5.2. The ethnomethodological paradigm. 5.3. Empirical findings. 6. Institutional summation. Chapter IV - Methodology. 1. Introduction. 2. Objectives of the study. 2.1. Aims of the study. 2.2. The questionnaires' and interviews' theoretical framework. 3. Research design. 3.1. Approach to the research. 3.2. Ethical issues. 3.3. Security issues. 3.4. The Likert scale. 3.5. The piloting. 4. The questionnaire. 4.1. The design. 4.2. The limits. 5. The interview. 5.1. The design. 6. The analysis. 6.1. Crossing data. 6.2. Qualitative analysis. 7. Summing up. Chapter V - Findings on criminal investigation management. 1. Profiling the study group. 1.1. Managers of Department of the Pol&#xED;cia Judici&#xE1;ria. 1.1.1. The director's profile. 1.1.1.1. By age, experience and academic qualification. 1.2. The inspector of Pol&#xED;cia Judici&#xE1;ria. 1.2.1. The inspector's profile. 2. Perspectives on criminal investigation. 2.1. Actual investigative performance. 2.2. Adequacy of current performance assessment. 2.3. Importance of performance assessment. 3. Characterizing the activity of criminal investigations. 3.1. The importance of creativity. 3.2. Autonomy versus discipline. 3.3. The importance of self study in criminal investigation. 3.4. Standard measurement in criminal investigation activities. 3.4.1. Criminal investigation activity and its outputs. 3.4.2. Criminal investigation performance indicators. 3.4.3. Who is the client of criminal investigation services. 3.4.4. The client's importance for assessment. 3.5. Performing criminal investigation differently. 3.6. Standard times in criminal investigation. 3.7. The hierarchy in criminal investigation. 4. Criminal investigators' productivity dimensions. 4.1. Quantity. 4.2. Costs. 4.3. Timeliness. 4.4. Autonomy. 4.5. Efficiency. 4.6. Quality. 4.7. Effectiveness. 4.8. Public satisfaction. 4.9. Innovation and creativity. 4.10. Criminal investigation success. 4.11. Responsibility and importance of work. 4.12. The investigators own perception of productivity. 4.13. Absenteeism. 5. The managerial dimension of performance assessment. 5.1. Managing the kind of resources. 5.2. Managing resources in number. 5.3. Designing a operation plan for the next time period. 5.4. Operation function analysis. 5.4.1. The inter-organizational factor. 5.4.2. The creativity factor. 5.4.3. The importance of group-timing. 5.4.4. The importance of independence. 5.4.5. Economy in criminal investigation. 5.4.6. Iindividual procedure analysis. 5.4.7. Assessing by sampling. 6. The analysis. Chapter VI - The investigative task - a knowledge-based activity. 1. Criminal investigation. 1.1. The investigative task - a knowledge-based activity. 2. Investigators as knowledge workers. 2.1. The investigators' scientificity. 2.2. Differentiating investigation from executive policing. 3. Managing criminal investigation. 3.1. Knowledge management in criminal investigation. 3.2. Performance assessment. 3.3. The way forward. 4. Summing up. Chapter VII - Understanding performance measurement. 1. Facts and findings. 2. Recommendations 2.1. Recommendations to improve criminal investigation performance assessment. 2.2. Recommendations for further study/research. 3. Summing up. 4. Concluding remark. Appendices: Formalities; Questionnaire for detectives (Cover letter delivered with the questionnaire; Detectives' questionnaire); Interview for managers. Bibliography.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="606" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">INVESTIGA&#xC7;&#xC3;O CRIMINAL</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">229431</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="606" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">AVALIA&#xC7;&#xC3;O DO PESSOAL</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">119998</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="606" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">GEST&#xC3;O DAS PERFORMANCES</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">349144</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="606" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">GEST&#xC3;O DOS CONHECIMENTOS</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">101240</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="606" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">GEST&#xC3;O POLICIAL</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">320121</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="606" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">POL&#xCD;CIA JUDICI&#xC1;RIA</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">242453</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">GUITA</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">Nuno M.</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">355534</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="955" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="x">Oferta</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="995" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="1">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="4">PJ_20_000000000000000_A_28</subfield>
    <subfield code="5">2022-06-06</subfield>
    <subfield code="6">PJ29277</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">418333</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">PJ</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">PJ</subfield>
    <subfield code="f">PJ129277</subfield>
    <subfield code="k">PJ20.A.28</subfield>
    <subfield code="n">2022-06-06</subfield>
    <subfield code="o">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="r">MO</subfield>
    <subfield code="x">Oferta</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="995" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="1">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="4">PJCD_138_000000000000000</subfield>
    <subfield code="5">2022-06-06</subfield>
    <subfield code="6">PJCD138</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">418334</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">PJ</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">PJ</subfield>
    <subfield code="f">PJ1CD138_23</subfield>
    <subfield code="k">PJCD138</subfield>
    <subfield code="n">2022-06-06</subfield>
    <subfield code="o">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="r">MO</subfield>
    <subfield code="x">Oferta</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="995" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="1">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="4">PJCD_246_000000000000000</subfield>
    <subfield code="5">2022-06-06</subfield>
    <subfield code="6">PJCD246</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">418335</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">PJ</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">PJ</subfield>
    <subfield code="f">PJ1CD246_27</subfield>
    <subfield code="k">PJCD246</subfield>
    <subfield code="n">2022-06-06</subfield>
    <subfield code="o">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="r">MO</subfield>
    <subfield code="x">Oferta</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
