<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="https://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="https://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim https://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="https://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>01518nam a2200217   4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">377852</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="090" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">377852</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">20201202u           y0pory50      ba</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="101" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">eng</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="200" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Evidence in international arbitration</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">Recurso eletr&#xF3;nico</subfield>
    <subfield code="e">admissibility, relevance and differences between Common and Civil Law</subfield>
    <subfield code="f">Tanmayi Sharma</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="311" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Resumo inserto na publica&#xE7;&#xE3;o.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="330" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">A arbitragem &#xE9; uma forma de resolu&#xE7;&#xE3;o alternativa de lit&#xED;gios. Os tribunais arbitrais n&#xE3;o est&#xE3;o geralmente vinculados &#xE0; observ&#xE2;ncia de regras legais que versem sobre os meios de obten&#xE7;&#xE3;o da prova e sobre o valor probat&#xF3;rio dos diversos meios de prova. Em face do vazio legal no que respeita &#xE0; prova na arbitragem internacional, analisam-se as regras que versam sobre os meios de obten&#xE7;&#xE3;o e a valora&#xE7;&#xE3;o da prova nos tribunais arbitrais. Neste artigo, procura avaliar-se a admissibilidade e o valor da prova na arbitragem internacional. Paralelamente, procura estabelecer-se as diferen&#xE7;as existentes a n&#xED;vel procedimental nas jurisdi&#xE7;&#xF5;es de Civil e Common Law, bem como assinalar o efeito pr&#xE1;tico e as implica&#xE7;&#xF5;es dessas mesmas diferen&#xE7;as.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="461" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">Lisboa</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">Maio 2018</subfield>
    <subfield code="v">Vol. 2, n. 2</subfield>
    <subfield code="t">Cat&#xF3;lica Law Review</subfield>
    <subfield code="x">2183-9336</subfield>
    <subfield code="p">p. 99-113</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="606" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">ARBITRAGEM</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="606" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">LIT&#xCD;GIO</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="606" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">VALOR PROBAT&#xD3;RIO</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="606" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">MEIO DE PROVA</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">SHARMA</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">Tanmayi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="995" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="1">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="4">PJCD_309_000000000000000</subfield>
    <subfield code="5">2022-06-06</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">405633</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">PJ</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">PJ</subfield>
    <subfield code="k">PJCD 309</subfield>
    <subfield code="n">2022-06-06</subfield>
    <subfield code="o">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="r">AP</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
