01328nam a2200181   4500001000700000090001100007100004100018101000800059200016700067311003900234330051800273461008600791606002500877606003300902606002200935710010000957995008901057377351  a377351  a20190212u           y0pory50      ba  aeng  aValidity of forensic odontology identification by comparison of conventionaldental radiographsbRecurso eletrónicoea scoping reviewfSher-Lin Chiam ...[et al.]  aFicheiro de 272 KB em formato PDF.  a1. Introduction. 2. Method. 3. Results. 3.1. The type and number of radiographs used in the studies. 3.2. The method employed for comparison of the radiographs. 3.3. Types and numbers of participants in each of these studies. 3.4. The scale used for assessment. 3.5. Presence or absence of case information to aid the comparison of radiographs. 3.6. Specific research questions and specific area of focus in these studies. 3.7. Validity: accuracy and reliability results. 4. Discussion. 5. Conclusion. References.  cHarrogatedJanuary 2019vVol. 59, n.º 1tScience & Justicex1355-0306pp. 93-101  aODONTOLOGIA FORENSE   aIDENTIFICAÇÃO DE PESSOAS  aCIÊNCIA FORENSE  aVALIDITY OF FORENSIC ODONTOLOGY IDENTIFICATION BY COMPARISON OF CONVENTIONAL DENTAL RADIOGRAPHS  104PJCD_298_00000000000000052022-06-069405132aPJcPJkPJCD 298n2022-06-06o0rAP