01363nam a2200205 4500 377351 377351 20190212u y0pory50 ba eng Validity of forensic odontology identification by comparison of conventionaldental radiographs Recurso eletrónico a scoping review Sher-Lin Chiam ...[et al.] Ficheiro de 272 KB em formato PDF. 1. Introduction. 2. Method. 3. Results. 3.1. The type and number of radiographs used in the studies. 3.2. The method employed for comparison of the radiographs. 3.3. Types and numbers of participants in each of these studies. 3.4. The scale used for assessment. 3.5. Presence or absence of case information to aid the comparison of radiographs. 3.6. Specific research questions and specific area of focus in these studies. 3.7. Validity: accuracy and reliability results. 4. Discussion. 5. Conclusion. References. Harrogate January 2019 Vol. 59, n.º 1 Science & Justice 1355-0306 p. 93-101 ODONTOLOGIA FORENSE IDENTIFICAÇÃO DE PESSOAS CIÊNCIA FORENSE VALIDITY OF FORENSIC ODONTOLOGY IDENTIFICATION BY COMPARISON OF CONVENTIONAL DENTAL RADIOGRAPHS 0 PJCD_298_000000000000000 2022-06-06 405132 PJ PJ PJCD 298 2022-06-06 0 AP