01204nam a2200157   4500001000700000100004100007101000800048200016700056311003900223330051800262461008600780606002500866606003300891606002200924710010000946377351  a20190212u           y0pory50      ba  aeng  aValidity of forensic odontology identification by comparison of conventionaldental radiographsbRecurso eletrónicoea scoping reviewfSher-Lin Chiam ...[et al.]  aFicheiro de 272 KB em formato PDF.  a1. Introduction. 2. Method. 3. Results. 3.1. The type and number of radiographs used in the studies. 3.2. The method employed for comparison of the radiographs. 3.3. Types and numbers of participants in each of these studies. 3.4. The scale used for assessment. 3.5. Presence or absence of case information to aid the comparison of radiographs. 3.6. Specific research questions and specific area of focus in these studies. 3.7. Validity: accuracy and reliability results. 4. Discussion. 5. Conclusion. References.  cHarrogatedJanuary 2019vVol. 59, n.º 1tScience & Justicex1355-0306pp. 93-101  aODONTOLOGIA FORENSE   aIDENTIFICAÇÃO DE PESSOAS  aCIÊNCIA FORENSE  aVALIDITY OF FORENSIC ODONTOLOGY IDENTIFICATION BY COMPARISON OF CONVENTIONAL DENTAL RADIOGRAPHS