<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="https://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="https://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim https://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="https://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>01215nam a2200217   4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">377275</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="090" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">377275</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">20190109u           y0pory50      ba</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="101" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">por</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="200" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">O &#xFA;til e o justo na gest&#xE3;o dos tribunais, em especial o juiz natural e a inamovibilidade</subfield>
    <subfield code="f">Pedro Soares de Albergaria</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="330" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">"&#xC9; minha inten&#xE7;&#xE3;o no estudo que se segue dar nota das interroga&#xE7;&#xF5;es, desafios e mesmo potencial de conflito que o 'ethos' gestion&#xE1;rio aportado pela Reforma da Org&#xE2;nica Judici&#xE1;ria implementada pela Lei 62/2013, de 26.8, com a redac&#xE7;&#xE3;o da Lei 40-A/2016, de 22.12 (LOSJ), introduz no confronto com princ&#xED;pios de estal&#xE3;o constitucional e em concreto com o do juiz natural e o da inamovibilidade dos ju&#xED;zes".</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="461" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">Coimbra</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">setembro-dezembro 2017</subfield>
    <subfield code="v">Ano 27, n.&#xBA; 3</subfield>
    <subfield code="t">Revista Portuguesa de Ci&#xEA;ncia Criminal</subfield>
    <subfield code="x">0871-8563</subfield>
    <subfield code="p">p. 539-569</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="606" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">ORGANIZA&#xC7;&#xC3;O JUDICI&#xC1;RIA</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="606" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">GEST&#xC3;O ADMINISTRATIVA</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="606" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">TRIBUNAL</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="606" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">SISTEMA JUDICI&#xC1;RIO</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="606" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">MOBILIDADE DE PESSOAL</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">ALBERGARIA</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">Pedro Soares de</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="995" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="1">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="4">PJ_36850_000000000000000</subfield>
    <subfield code="5">2022-06-06</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">405056</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">PJ</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">PJ</subfield>
    <subfield code="k">PJ36850</subfield>
    <subfield code="n">2022-06-06</subfield>
    <subfield code="o">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="r">AP</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
