01827nam a2200181   4500001000700000090001100007100004100018101000800059200011000067311007400177330110700251461007401358606004001432606003201472606002801504700002401532995008901556377159  a377159  a20180606u           y0pory50      ba  aeng  aThe European investigation order and the joint investigation teamewhich road to takefRositsa Zaharieva   aResumo inserto na publicação. Ficheiro de 995 KB em formato PDF.   aThis article compares the use of two legal assistance instruments—the European Investigation Order (EIO), introduced by the Directive regarding the European Investigation Order (Directive 2014/41/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 3 April 2014 regarding the European Investigation Order in criminal matters [2014] OJ L 130/1) and the Joint Investigation Team (JIT) based on the Convention on Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters from 2000 (Council Act of 29 May 2000 establishing in accordance with Art. 34 of the Treaty on European Union the Convention on Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters between the Member States of the European Union [2000] OJ C 197/1) and on the 2002 JIT Framework Decision (Council Framework Decision of 13 June 2002 on joint investigation teams [2002] OJ L 162/1). While acknowledging the different philosophies of classic judicial cooperation and mutual recognition, entrenched in these tools, the article seeks to highlight the benefits and constraints a legal practitioner might have when considering their application in a complex cross-border case.  cTrierdSeptember 2017vV. 18, nº 3tERA Forumx1612-3093pp. 397-408  aEQUIPA DE INVESTIGAÇÃO CONJUNTA  aCOOPERAÇÃO JUDICIÁRIA  aCOOPERAÇÃO EUROPEIA  aZAHARIEVAbRositsa   104PJCD_283_00000000000000052022-06-069404940aPJcPJkPJCD 283n2022-06-06o0rAP