<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="https://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="https://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim https://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="https://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>00954nam a2200205   4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">377008</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="090" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">377008</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">20180222u           y0pory50      ba</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="101" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">por</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="200" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">A valora&#xE7;&#xE3;o da prova pericial</subfield>
    <subfield code="f">Lu&#xED;s Filipe Pires de Sousa</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="311" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">(*) CD 291. Resumo inserto no artigo.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="330" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Neste artigo analisamos a prova pericial em especial os "standards" que o julgador de facto deve seguir quando avalia a prova pericial. Discutimos o papel do juiz e o papel do perito, defendendo que o juiz mant&#xE9;m a sua autonomia e que o perito n&#xE3;o pode fazer as vezes de juiz.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="461" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">Coimbra</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">Dezembro 2016</subfield>
    <subfield code="v">Ano 25, n.&#xBA; 27</subfield>
    <subfield code="t">Revista Portuguesa do Dano Corporal</subfield>
    <subfield code="x">1645-0760</subfield>
    <subfield code="p">p. 11-24</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="606" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">PROVA PERICIAL</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="606" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">PERITO</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">SOUSA</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">Lu&#xED;s Filipe Pires de</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="995" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="1">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="4">PJ_36395_000000000000000</subfield>
    <subfield code="5">2022-06-06</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">404789</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">PJ</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">PJ</subfield>
    <subfield code="k">PJ36395</subfield>
    <subfield code="n">2022-06-06</subfield>
    <subfield code="o">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="r">AP</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
