<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="https://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="https://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim https://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="https://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>01854nam a2200217   4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">376741</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="090" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">376741</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">20170804u           y0pory50      ba</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="101" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">por</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="200" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">As buscas domicili&#xE1;rias na Regi&#xE3;o Administrativa Especial de Macau e em Portugal e as exclusionary rules norte-americanas</subfield>
    <subfield code="e">perspectivas e prospectivas</subfield>
    <subfield code="f">Hugo Luz dos Santos</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="330" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">I - Introdu&#xE7;&#xE3;o. II - O regime jur&#xED;dico das buscas domicili&#xE1;rias contido no artigo 162.&#xBA;, n.&#xBA; l, do C&#xF3;digo de Processo Penal de Macau e as proibi&#xE7;&#xF5;es de prova (artigo 113.&#xB0;, do C&#xF3;digo de Processo Penal de Macau) &#xE0; luz da doutrina norte-americana da "exclusionary rule": a jurisprud&#xEA;ncia do Supremo Tribunal Federal dos Estados Unidos da Am&#xE9;rica (US Supreme Court) e do Tribunal Europeu dos Direitos do Homem (TEDH) em mat&#xE9;ria de "independent source" "purged tainted limitation" e "inevitable discovery" e da "wilful blindness". III - Breve alus&#xE3;o &#xE0; distin&#xE7;&#xE3;o entrada no domic&#xED;lio e busca domicili&#xE1;ria. IV - A entrada no domic&#xED;lio e as buscas domicili&#xE1;rias como express&#xE3;o de um novo paradigma de "preven&#xE7;&#xE3;o de perigos" e das formas de investiga&#xE7;&#xE3;o criminal de campo avan&#xE7;ado ("vorfeldermittlungen"); segue, the good-faith exception to the exclusionary rules e a no&#xE7;&#xE3;o dogm&#xE1;tica da "knock and announce" - o artigo 159.&#xB0;, n.&#xBA; 4, al&#xED;nea a), do CPP de Macau e a tutela (avan&#xE7;ada) da dignidade da pessoa humana (artigo 30.&#xB0;, n.&#xB0; 1, da Lei B&#xE1;sica de Macau).</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="461" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">Lisboa</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">2017</subfield>
    <subfield code="v">A. 149, n.&#xBA; 1</subfield>
    <subfield code="t">O Direito</subfield>
    <subfield code="x">0873-4372</subfield>
    <subfield code="p">p. 117-151</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="606" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">BUSCAS</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="606" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">MEDIDAS DE POL&#xCD;CIA</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="606" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">PROCESSO PENAL</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="606" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">MACAU</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">SANTOS</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">Hugo Luz</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="995" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="1">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="4">PJCD_283_000000000000000</subfield>
    <subfield code="5">2022-06-06</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">404522</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">PJ</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">PJ</subfield>
    <subfield code="k">PJCD 283</subfield>
    <subfield code="n">2022-06-06</subfield>
    <subfield code="o">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="r">AP</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
