<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="https://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="https://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim https://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="https://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>01404nam a2200229   4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">376670</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="090" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">376670</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">20170629u           y0pory50      ba</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="101" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">por</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="200" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">&#xAB; Non-conviction based confiscations &#xBB; no direito penal portugu&#xEA;s vigente</subfield>
    <subfield code="e">" quem tem medo do lobo mau? "</subfield>
    <subfield code="f">Jo&#xE3;o Conde Correia</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="311" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Resumo inserto na publica&#xE7;&#xE3;o.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="330" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">A ideia de confisco n&#xE3;o baseado numa condena&#xE7;&#xE3;o (actio in rem) &#xE9; proveniente dos sistemas da&#xA0;"common law"&#xA0;e, normalmente, considerada como incompat&#xED;vel com os sistemas da&#xA0;"civil law". No entanto, mesmo assim, foi consagrada, entre n&#xF3;s, logo no C&#xF3;digo Penal de 1982, desenvolveu-se com a reforma do C&#xF3;digo Penal (operada pelo Decreto-Lei n.&#xBA; 48/95, de 15 de mar&#xE7;o) e consolidou-se com a cria&#xE7;&#xE3;o de um regime de perda do patrim&#xF3;nio incongruente (artigo 7.&#xBA; da Lei n.&#xBA; 5/2002, de 11 de janeiro). As recentes altera&#xE7;&#xF5;es mantiveram o paradigma, mas ainda n&#xE3;o esgotaram as suas virtualidades.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="461" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">Coimbra</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">Maio-Agosto 2017</subfield>
    <subfield code="v">N.&#xBA; 32</subfield>
    <subfield code="t">Julgar</subfield>
    <subfield code="x">1646-6853</subfield>
    <subfield code="p">p. 71-95</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="606" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">CONFISCO DE BENS</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="606" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">ENRIQUECIMENTO IL&#xCD;CITO</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="606" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">PRODUTOS DO CRIME</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="606" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">PROCESSO PENAL</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">CORREIA</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">Jo&#xE3;o Conde</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="995" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="1">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="4">PJ_36144_000000000000000</subfield>
    <subfield code="5">2022-06-06</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">404451</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">PJ</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">PJ</subfield>
    <subfield code="k">PJ36144</subfield>
    <subfield code="n">2022-06-06</subfield>
    <subfield code="o">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="r">AP</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
