<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="https://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="https://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim https://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="https://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>01559nam a2200229   4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">376668</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="090" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">376668</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">20170629u           y0pory50      ba</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="101" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">por</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="200" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Proibi&#xE7;&#xE3;o de desfavorecimento do arguido em consequ&#xEA;ncia do sil&#xEA;ncio em julgamento</subfield>
    <subfield code="e">a quest&#xE3;o controversa das ila&#xE7;&#xF5;es probat&#xF3;rias desfavor&#xE1;veis</subfield>
    <subfield code="f">Manuel Soares</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="311" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">(*) CD 283.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="330" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">A prop&#xF3;sito do princ&#xED;pio&#xA0;"nemo tenetur se ipsum accusare", e mais especificamente do exerc&#xED;cio do direito ao sil&#xEA;ncio em julgamento, o autor analisa o &#xE2;mbito da proibi&#xE7;&#xE3;o de desfavorecimento estabelecida nos artigos 343.&#xBA;, n.&#xBA; 1, e 345.&#xBA;, n.&#xBA; 1, do C&#xF3;digo de Processo Penal. Em confronto com a jurisprud&#xEA;ncia do Tribunal Europeu dos Direitos Humanos, que admite em circunst&#xE2;ncias excepcionais que o tribunal retire do sil&#xEA;ncio ila&#xE7;&#xF5;es de prova desfavor&#xE1;veis ao arguido, verifica a lei e as decis&#xF5;es dos tribunais portugueses e chega &#xE0; conclus&#xE3;o de que essa possibilidade n&#xE3;o &#xE9; admitida no nosso sistema jur&#xED;dico. No entanto, deixa em aberto pistas de reflex&#xE3;o sobre aspectos conexos para os quais n&#xE3;o h&#xE1; uma resposta inequ&#xED;voca.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="461" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">Coimbra</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">Maio-Agosto 2017</subfield>
    <subfield code="v">N.&#xBA; 32</subfield>
    <subfield code="t">Julgar</subfield>
    <subfield code="x">1646-6853</subfield>
    <subfield code="p">p. 13-44</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="606" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">DIREITO AO SIL&#xCA;NCIO</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="606" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">ARGUIDO</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="606" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">JULGAMENTO</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">SOARES</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">Manuel</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="995" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="1">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="4">PJ_36144_000000000000000</subfield>
    <subfield code="5">2022-06-06</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">404449</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">PJ</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">PJ</subfield>
    <subfield code="k">PJ36144</subfield>
    <subfield code="n">2022-06-06</subfield>
    <subfield code="o">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="r">AP</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
