<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="https://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="https://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim https://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="https://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>01707nam a2200265   4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">376510</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="090" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">376510</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">20170215u           y0pory50      ba</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="101" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">eng</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="200" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Putting the Mr. Big technique back on trial</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">Recurso eletr&#xF3;nico</subfield>
    <subfield code="e">a re-examination of probative value and abuse of process through a scientific lens</subfield>
    <subfield code="f">Kirk Luther, Brent Snook</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="311" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Ficheiro de 209 KB em formato PDF (13 p.).</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="330" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">&#xC9; discutida uma decis&#xE3;o recente do Supremo Tribunal do Canad&#xE1; que determinou um uso mais restrito da t&#xE9;cnica "Mr. Big", por parte das organiza&#xE7;&#xF5;es policiais. Esta t&#xE9;cnica visa obter confiss&#xF5;es atrav&#xE9;s de uma opera&#xE7;&#xE3;o com agentes infiltrados. O STC colocou sobre os procuradores o &#xF3;nus de demonstrar que o valor probat&#xF3;rio de qualquer confiss&#xE3;o derivada da "Mr. Big" supera o seu efeito prejudicial. Determina-se ainda que a pol&#xED;cia deve abster-se de um abuso de processo (ou seja, evitar superar a vontade do acusado para obter uma confiss&#xE3;o). O objetivo deste trabalho &#xE9; avaliar se as t&#xE1;ticas de influ&#xEA;ncia social presentes na t&#xE9;cnica "Mr. Big" podem tornar inadmiss&#xED;veis as confiss&#xF5;es obtidas.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="461" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="d">2016</subfield>
    <subfield code="v">Vol. 18, n&#xBA; 2</subfield>
    <subfield code="t">Journal of Forensic Practice</subfield>
    <subfield code="x">2050-8794</subfield>
    <subfield code="p">p. 131-142</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="606" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">CONFISS&#xC3;O</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="606" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">AGENTE PROVOCADOR</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="606" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">AGENTE INFILTRADO</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="606" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">VALOR PROBAT&#xD3;RIO</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="606" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">T&#xC9;CNICA DE INVESTIGA&#xC7;&#xC3;O CRIMINAL</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="606" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">CANAD&#xC1;</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">LUTHER</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">Kirk</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="701" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">SNOOK</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">Brent</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="995" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="1">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="4">PJCD_269_000000000000000</subfield>
    <subfield code="5">2022-06-06</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">404291</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">PJ</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">PJ</subfield>
    <subfield code="k">PJCD 269</subfield>
    <subfield code="n">2022-06-06</subfield>
    <subfield code="o">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="r">AP</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
