<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="https://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="https://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim https://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="https://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>01659nam a2200241   4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">376148</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="090" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">376148</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">20160224u           y0pory50      ba</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="101" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">por</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="200" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Terrorism 2.0</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">Recurso eletr&#xF3;nico</subfield>
    <subfield code="e">the rise of the civilitary battlefield</subfield>
    <subfield code="f">Gil Avriel</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="311" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Ficheiro de 827 KB em formato PDF (42 p.).</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="330" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">I. The Gap: Old Words, New Reality. II. Civilitary Theory: Evolution From Terrorist Groups to Territorial Terrorist Groups. A. Civilitary Model I: Territorial Acquisition. B. Civilitary Model II: Triple Terrorism Strategy. C. Civilitary Model III: Acquiring and Using Ballistic Missiles and Embedding Them in Densely Populated Residential Areas. 1. Terrorocketing or Terroballistic Capabilities. 2. The Strategy of Ascivilation. III. Applying the Theory: Classifying 6 Territorial Terrorist Groups According to Civilitary Models I, II and III. A. Model III types: Hamas and Hezbollah. 1. Hamas. 2. Hezbollah. B. Model II Types: Boko Haram, ISIL and Ansar Bayt al-Maqdis. 1. Boko Haram. 2. ISIL. 3. Ansar Bayt al-Maqdis (ISIL in the Sinai Peninsula). C. Model I Types: The Houthis in Yemen. IV. The Future Use of Civilitary Theory.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="461" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">Cambridge, MA</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">2016</subfield>
    <subfield code="v">Vol. 7, n&#xBA; 1</subfield>
    <subfield code="t">Harvard National Security Journal</subfield>
    <subfield code="x">2153-1358</subfield>
    <subfield code="p">p. 199-240</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="606" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">TERRORISMO</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="606" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">GRUPO TERRORISTA</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="606" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">JIHAD ISL&#xC2;MICA</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="606" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">M&#xC9;DIO ORIENTE</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="606" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">&#xC1;FRICA DO NORTE</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">AVRIEL</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">Gil</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="995" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="1">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="4">PJCD_263_000000000000000</subfield>
    <subfield code="5">2022-06-06</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">403929</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">PJ</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">PJ</subfield>
    <subfield code="k">PJCD 263</subfield>
    <subfield code="n">2022-06-06</subfield>
    <subfield code="o">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="r">AP</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
