<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="https://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="https://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim https://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="https://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>02328nam a2200265   4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">376013</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="090" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">376013</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">20151020u           y0pory50      ba</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="101" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">eng</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="200" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">A survey of some metallographic etching reagents for restoration of obliteratedengraved marks on aluminium&#x2013;silicon alloy surfaces</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">Recurso eletr&#xF3;nico</subfield>
    <subfield code="f">Norjaidi Uli, R. Kuppuswamy, Mohd Firdaus Che Amran</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="311" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">(*). Resumo inserto na publica&#xE7;&#xE3;o. Ficheiro de 1,07 MB em formato PDF (8 p.).</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="330" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">A brief survey to assess the sensitivity and efficacy of some common etching reagents for revealing obliterated engraved marks on Al&#x2013;Si alloy surfaces is presented. Experimental observations have recommended use of alternate swabbing of 10% NaOH and 10% HNO3 on the obliterated surfaces for obtaining the desired results. The NaOH etchant responsible for bringing back the original marks resulted in the deposition of some dark coating that has masked the recovered marks. The coating had been well removed by dissolving it in HNO3 containing 10&#x2013;20% acid. However, the above etching procedure was not effective on aluminium (99% purity) and Al&#x2013;Zn&#x2013;Mg&#x2013;Cu alloy surfaces. Also the two reagents (i) immersion in 10% aq. phosphoric acid and (ii) alternate swabbing of 60% HCl and 40% NaOH suggested earlier for high strength Al&#x2013;Zn Mg&#x2013;Cu alloys [23] were quite ineffective on Al&#x2013;Si alloys. Thus different aluminium alloys needed different etching treatments for successfully restoring the obliterated marks. Al&#x2013;Si alloys used in casting find wide applications especially in the manufacture of engine blocks of motor vehicles. Hence, the results presented in this paper are of much relevance in serial number restoration problems involving this alloy.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="461" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="d">May 2011</subfield>
    <subfield code="v">Vol. 208, n. 1-3</subfield>
    <subfield code="t">Forensic Science International</subfield>
    <subfield code="x">0379-0738</subfield>
    <subfield code="p">p. 66-73</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="606" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">QU&#xCD;MICA FORENSE</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="606" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">VE&#xCD;CULO AUTOM&#xD3;VEL</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="606" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">MARCA&#xC7;&#xC3;O DE OBJECTOS</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="606" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">AN&#xC1;LISE LABORATORIAL</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="606" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">CI&#xCA;NCIA FORENSE</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="606" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">ESTUDO DE CASOS</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">ULI</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">Norjaidi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="701" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">KUPPUSWAMY</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">R.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="701" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">AMRAN</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">Mohd Firdaus Che</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="995" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="1">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="4">PJ_04_010000000000000__ARTIGOS_DIGITALIZADOS</subfield>
    <subfield code="5">2022-06-06</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">403794</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">PJ</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">PJ</subfield>
    <subfield code="k">PJ04.01 - Artigos digitalizados</subfield>
    <subfield code="n">2022-06-06</subfield>
    <subfield code="o">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="r">AP</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
