<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="https://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="https://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim https://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="https://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>00963nam a2200193   4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">375350</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="090" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">375350</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">20131112u           y0pory50      ba</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="101" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">por</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="200" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">O projecto de revis&#xE3;o do CPA</subfield>
    <subfield code="e">breves notas, muito t&#xF3;picas, entre a satisfa&#xE7;&#xE3;o e o espanto</subfield>
    <subfield code="f">Carla Amado Gomes</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="311" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">(*). Resumo inserto no artigo.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="330" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">a) Uma satisfa&#xE7;&#xE3;o (e algumas retic&#xEA;ncias): a legitimidade procedimental (artigo 64&#xB0;); b) Um espanto: a prescindibilidade de pareceres vinculantes (artigo 89&#xB0;/4 e 5); c) Uma (nova) satisfa&#xE7;&#xE3;o (e algumas interroga&#xE7;&#xF5;es): o artigo 126&#xB0;/5.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="461" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">Lisboa</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">Julho-Setembro 2013</subfield>
    <subfield code="v">Ano 34, n&#xBA; 135</subfield>
    <subfield code="t">Revista do Minist&#xE9;rio P&#xFA;blico</subfield>
    <subfield code="x">0870-6107</subfield>
    <subfield code="p">p. 9-22 </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="606" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">C&#xD3;DIGO DO PROCEDIMENTO ADMINISTRATIVO</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">GOMES</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">Carla Amado</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="995" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="1">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="4">PJ_34061_000000000000000</subfield>
    <subfield code="5">2022-06-06</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">403131</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">PJ</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">PJ</subfield>
    <subfield code="k">PJ34061</subfield>
    <subfield code="n">2022-06-06</subfield>
    <subfield code="o">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="r">AP</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
