<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="https://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="https://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim https://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="https://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>01357nam a2200181   4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">375349</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="090" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">375349</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">20131106u           y0pory50      ba</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="101" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">por</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="200" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">As garantias administrativas e o indeferimento t&#xE1;cito</subfield>
    <subfield code="f">Henrique Dias da Silva</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="330" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">O articulista analisa as garantias jur&#xED;dicas dos cidad&#xE3;os, em particular "(...) as garantias administrativas que se distinguem quer das garantias jurisdicionais, quer de outras garantias asseguradas por &#xF3;rg&#xE3;os n&#xE3;o judiciais, nem administrativos, como &#xE9; o caso do Provedor de Justi&#xE7;a.", tendo em particular aten&#xE7;&#xE3;o as reclama&#xE7;&#xF5;es e os recursos hier&#xE1;rquicos, face &#xE0;s consequ&#xEA;ncias da entrada em vigor do C&#xF3;digo do Processo dos Tribunais Administrativos em 2004, do qual resultou doutrina que considera "(...) que a previs&#xE3;o legal do indeferimento t&#xE1;cito j&#xE1; n&#xE3;o se justificava por manifesta desnecessidade, entendendo que o artigo 109.&#xBA; do C&#xF3;digo do Procedimento Administrativo se encontrava tacitamente revogado.".</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="461" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">Lisboa</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">Abril-Junho 2013</subfield>
    <subfield code="v">Ano 25, n.&#xBA; 98</subfield>
    <subfield code="t">Pela Lei e Pela Grei</subfield>
    <subfield code="x">1645-9253</subfield>
    <subfield code="p">p. 52-54</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="606" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">PROCESSO ADMINISTRATIVO</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="606" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">RELA&#xC7;&#xC3;O ADMINISTRA&#xC7;&#xC3;O-ADMINISTRADO</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">SILVA</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">Henrique Dias da </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="995" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="1">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="4">PJ_34056_000000000000000_CD_256</subfield>
    <subfield code="5">2022-06-06</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">403130</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">PJ</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">PJ</subfield>
    <subfield code="k">PJ34056 / CD 256</subfield>
    <subfield code="n">2022-06-06</subfield>
    <subfield code="o">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="r">AP</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
