<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="https://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="https://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim https://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="https://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>01519nam a2200217   4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">375127</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="090" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">375127</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">20130125u           y0pory50      ba</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="101" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">eng</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="200" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">What is securities fraud?</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">Recurso eletr&#xF3;nico</subfield>
    <subfield code="f">Samuel W. Buell</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="311" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">(*). </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="330" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Introduction. I. What is fraud?. A. The question is hard and important. B. Some axes of fraud. C. Mental state and fraud. 1. Core fraud versus misrepresentation. 2. Goal versus awareness. 3. Level of awareness. 4. Criminal fault. II. What is securities fraud?. A. structure of the statutory and regulatory scheme. B. Elements, according to the federal courts. C. The Scienter mess. 1. Private Lawsuits. 2. SEC actions. 3. Criminal prosecutions. D. Insider trading. E. Securities fraud remains undefined. III. Improving the law of securities fraud. A. Costs of the status quo. B. Objectives for reform. 1. Fraud and the purposes of securities regulation. 2. The civil-criminal line. 3. Capitalizing on expressive capital. C. Reform angels. 1. Amend the statutes and rules. 2. Repair the doctrine in the courts. Conclusion.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="461" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">Durham</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">December 2011</subfield>
    <subfield code="v">V.61, n&#xBA; 3</subfield>
    <subfield code="t">Duke Law Journal</subfield>
    <subfield code="x">0012-7086</subfield>
    <subfield code="p">p. 511-581</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="606" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">FRAUDE FINANCEIRA</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="606" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">INFORMA&#xC7;&#xC3;O PRIVILEGIADA</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="606" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">SEGURAN&#xC7;A DE INFORMA&#xC7;&#xD5;ES</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="606" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">PREVEN&#xC7;&#xC3;O DA CORRUP&#xC7;&#xC3;O</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">BUELL</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">Samuel W.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="995" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="1">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="5">2022-06-06</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">402908</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">PJ</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">PJ</subfield>
    <subfield code="n">2022-06-06</subfield>
    <subfield code="o">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="r">AP</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
